Home Ad Exchange News ‘Real Time’: A Misnomer In Display Advertising

‘Real Time’: A Misnomer In Display Advertising

SHARE:

timmayer“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Tim Mayer, chief marketing officer at Trueffect.

“Real time” – in terms of data or targeting – is an overused phrase in display advertising.

“The rise of programmatic display lulls us into believing that we are advertising in ‘real time,’” Dax Hamman recently asserted. In reality, it is often only the bidding process that is truly “real-time” in nature. Conversely, much of the data being used to determine bids and make decisions on which creative to serve to the user is based on “non-real-time” data.

There are two primary areas where data gets stale. The first takes place in internal systems that aggregate first-party data, including customer registration and CRM data, with marketing data about what a user has been doing on the website. The second instance occurs whenCRM and website data are not being mobilized to the edge (into the user’s browser), where it can be leveraged for creative decisioning in real time.

In the first scenario, many companies separate CRM and website behavioral data into silos, where they cannot synchronize with each other to get an actionable, 360-degree profile of a user. If this information is synced, it is commonly done daily, creating a lag between the data that is used for targeting and the data in the advertising systems’ databases.

To improve marketing performance and the true “real-time” quality of the data, a company must not only create a data warehouse where it can aggregate CRM and first-party behavioral data, but it also needs to ensure the data flows from its CRM database and website in real time. This requires continuous improvement of the IT process and can sometimes take companies a year or more to evolve to this desired state.

In the second scenario, many advertisers are either not targeting with first-party data (CRM and website behavioral data), or they are targeting with third-party behavioral data. In either case, the data used for targeting is not real-time in nature. When users target with third-party data, it can become especially stale. This third-party behavioral data is collected on a third-party site, which is tracked, and a user is placed into a specific segment based on his or her visit to a specific section of a site.

A specific advertiser may purchase a segment, for example, of all users who visited the SUV section of Edmunds.com. One of the users in the purchased segment may come to an auto brand’s site and begin looking at the station wagon section after only an initial glance at SUVs. In the first-party data-technology environment, if that behavioral site data could flow through seamlessly, the user would now be targeted with station wagon ads for the specific brand. On the other hand, if only stale third-party segment data is used, the consumer will still be shown ads for SUVs they are no longer considering, causing these ads to underperform.

In the ideal state, the ad server needs to take relevant first-party data and push it into the user’s browser where it can be leveraged by the advertiser to better target the user in real time, with creative based on the segment in which the user has been placed.

In the retail industry, for instance, users could be separated into four segments:

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

1. Net new/unknown: The advertiser has not seen this prospect before and a CTR-based offer should be served to try to get the user to visit the site.

2. Visitors (recent or lapsed): A value-based offer, such as a discount or coupon, should be used to lure the prospect to make their first purchase, establish the relationship and create some first-party data in the process.

3. Visitors (with known product interest): Offer-based messaging, based on knowledge of location or product, should be made.

4. Existing customer (with known product interest): An upsell, cross-sell or retention message should be used.

There are visibly high benefits to ad targeting by moving in-house first-party data closer to true “real time,” and pushing that real-time data out to the edge (within a user’s browser) so the ad creative can be decisioned in real time at the time of serving. This can lead to huge campaign performance improvements, especially in the purchase funnel and high-consideration purchase industries.

The constant chatter about “real-time” bidding with the rapid rise of programmatic bidding should not cloud our understanding that the critical data for superior ad performance is still not being utilized in real time for segmenting users or creative ad decisioning.

Follow Tim Mayer (@timmayer), Trueffect (@Trueffect_Tweet) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.