Home Ad Exchange News The Influencer Perspective On Cross-Channel Marketing

The Influencer Perspective On Cross-Channel Marketing

SHARE:

influencerpovimgSocial influencers and content creators, many of whom first distinguished themselves by making and distributing content on a single platform (Instagram influencers, YouTube creators and Vine aficionados), are benefitting from platform proliferation.

Nicola Foti, for instance, parlayed his experience making personal videos and sketches on YouTube for more than half a decade into a multichannel production company, which significantly expands his potential future earnings.

“When I have a sponsor, if I make a video for it on my main (YouTube) channel, a part of the deal will also be that I tweet it out and put a clip on Instagram and Snapchat,” said Foti. “The idea is I think that multiple views make people more inclined to remember the brand or check out the brand and why I’m promoting it.”

A cross-channel campaign also adds to, or even multiplies, the amount a brand will pay for a campaign, according to many social media content producers AdExchanger spoke to. Once the content’s in the bag, it requires little work to push across channels.

Social media production isn’t quite a full-time job yet, but it’s moving in that direction, said Kevin Nether, who has about 108,000 subscribers to his “Kevin the Tech Ninja” YouTube channel, 40,000 Twitter followers and is looking to “diversify his social media portfolio” with Snapchat and Instagram.

Numerous companies exist solely to facilitate the relationship between brands and content creators like Kevin – increasingly referred to as “micro-influencers” to distinguish them from Instagram/Twitter celebrities who get paid massively more for mere social media mentions.

While major media holding companies are trying to formalize the talent acquisition, measurement and buying processes for social media creators, it’s still pretty much a free-for-all.

For instance, although Cody Johns has an established cross-channel brand with hundreds of thousands of followers across social media platforms, he said he has to be flexible enough to adjust to brand needs or open up a revenue angle.

There’s also very little information feedback between the content creator and the brand or agency.

“The brands have ways to look deeper and see deeper analytics,” said Johns, who himself uses cross-channel production and management tech, but not the kind of enterprise marketing services brands deploy.

“The brand may occasionally let us know if it’s effective or moves products,” he said, and sometimes a tracking link might be added to a post, but there’s essentially no feedback on what worked or didn’t work beyond visible metrics such as retweets, comments and likes.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“If the brand comes back for a second campaign, you know there must have been positive ROI,” said Jason Nash, a professional social media content creator.

While marketers work on measurement, they keep those efforts away from influencers and users. Brands don’t interfere with the creative, but they also don’t incentivize the results.

“I prefer it that way,” said Nether, who said he’d rather take a flat fee over a commission tied to views, engagement or sales, though he knows people who get paid based on KPIs.

“But I invest so much time in making these videos, I shouldn’t be penalized if nobody wants to buy the product,” Nether said.

Second-order effects like sales and retargeting audience segments are important to the marketer but obscured from the influencer. And that list can also include user-generated content (UGC), a major driver of influencer marketing growth as a way to get organic social media posts about a brand.

“I remember one campaign I ran with McDonald’s goofing around about their dollar menu on Snapchat and Twitter, and they were clear they wanted UGC they could use,” said one influencer who requested anonymity due to a nondisclosure agreement and ongoing campaigns.

“I was getting all these responses like, ‘Ohhh yes, tenders for life,’ and ‘I’m starting a Kickstarter for pillows stuffed with McDonald’s fries,’” he said. “And if you check the McDonald’s brand’s own parallel posts for the campaign, it’s just people saying horrible things to them about animal welfare and heart disease.”

He paused.

“How do you measure that?”

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: "Deal ID, please."

The Trade Desk And PubMatic Are Done Pretending Deal IDs Work

The Trade Desk and PubMatic announced a new API-based integration for managing deal ID campaigns built atop TTD’s Price Discovery and Provisioning (PDP) API, which was announced earlier this year.

Uber Launches A Platform-Specific Attention Metric With Adelaide And Kantar

Uber Advertising, in partnership with Adelaide and Kantar, launched a first-of-its-type custom attention metric score for its platform advertisers.

Google Shakes Off Its Troubles And Outperforms On Revenue Yet Again

Alphabet reported on Wednesday that its total Q3 revenue was $102.3 billion, up 16% year over year, while net profit increased by a third to $35 billion.