Home Data-Driven Thinking Expressed Data: The Future Of Targeting

Expressed Data: The Future Of Targeting

SHARE:

timmayerupdatedData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Tim Mayer, chief marketing officer at Trueffect.

For years, the display advertising space has targeted users based on inferred data, which is derived from the types of media people consume, rather than who they are and what they do offline. This approach relies on third parties that collect behavioral data across websites by using cookies and tags to determine the sites a user visits and the content he or she consumes.

But third-party cookies are on the decline, largely due to consumer privacy concerns. And with fewer cookies available, it becomes increasingly expensive to use them for retargeting purposes – and it costs even more to prospect for new customers. Fortunately for marketers, new forms of data, including expressed data, are becoming available.

Expressed data is more accurate and powerful than inferred data because it is personal information that the users themselves willingly provide to brands they want to be associated with. The brand can then leverage the data to further its relationship with the consumer.

Facebook Explores Expressed Data With Atlas Ad Server Launch 

Facebook has made expressed data available to advertisers on its website for some time. With the launch of its reinvented Atlas ad server platform, it extends the reach of expressed data beyond its site to the entire web. This launch has made all expressed Facebook data, such as demographic and psychographic information and a person’s likes – not a cookie – available across many external inventory sources within its ad network. I predict LinkedIn will follow suit and start providing a similar B2B offering in the near future.

Enterprises Activate First-Party Data

First-party data is typically collected from registration forms, on-website behaviors and metadata. Many enterprises are already storing much of this information in their technology infrastructure, but it is not connected in a way that makes it actionable for user targeting, programmatic bidding or creative decision-making in display advertising. More often, this data is traded with companies in parallel industries, such as hotels and credit card companies, to provide a more accurate, 360-degree view of customers and prospects, but this turns the first-party data into second-party data for those collaborating.

Mobile And Wearables To Provide Highly Expressive Data For Targeting

The rise of mobile is delivering another form of expressed data, bringing location to the forefront and tracking personal media consumption as people watch TV and video on mobile devices instead of traditional televisions. This kind of information will reinvent advertising for location-based businesses and help migrate TV dollars online.

Wearable devices will also start delivering expressed data and move it even further along the inferred-to-expressed continuum to include users’ hopes, aspirations, fitness and physical activity. Although there’s a market for high-tech glasses and watches, fitness devices are the most popular consumer wearable and therefore generate data from the broadest user base. This information can enable a ski store to target skiers with the right skis based on the number of vertical feet they’ve skied per day, or allow a restaurant to text a coupon to a nearby hungry office worker right before lunch time.

Looking Ahead

Before we start mourning the decline of third-party cookies and behavioral data, we should think about at all the powerful new expressed data that will be generated in 2015 and beyond. The key to higher-performing campaigns is not just access to these superior data sets, but also having the technology to make this data actionable at the point of delivery for ad decisioning, programmatic bidding and targeting.

Follow Tim Mayer (@timmayer), Trueffect (@Trueffect_Tweet) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Omnicom Investors Cheer IPG Sell-Off, Despite Weak Ad Spend In Q2

Omnicom is halfway through a major sell-off of IPG agencies. Its future looks healthier as it prunes lower-growth firms, including eliminating certain specialist firms and overlapping agencies in certain countries.

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”