Home Data-Driven Thinking Getting The DMP Integration Right

Getting The DMP Integration Right

SHARE:

dominic-saturData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Dominic Satur, US platform director at Flashtalking.

Data-driven marketing is only as strong as the ability to ingest, model and apply the data at our fingertips. But as adoption of data-management platforms (DMP) becomes widespread among advertisers, one of the biggest challenges has been integrating this valuable, granular data into other platforms for media buying or creative personalization.

Early industry efforts have focused on server-to-server cookie mapping, where two platforms match their cookie pools through pixel firing. It’s not a perfect solution. The resulting match tables allow for segment data to be transferred between platforms, imported and onboarded to the partner. There are products on the market that can turbo charge this matching process through their broad matching reach, but they still only expect match rates of about 70%.

The other stumbling block to this approach is time lag. Many platforms offer daily log file transfer, but once onboarding times are factored, it still could be 36 hours before the data can be used. In today’s marketplace, speed to market is of the essence.

Given the demands of a fast-paced marketplace and the desire for the most precise possible data-driven marketing, I believe that it’s critical to explore alternative approaches to more quickly integrate and use as much DMP segment data as possible.

For perspective, you could think of the unmatched portions in terms of targeting waste: Since a third of an advertiser’s audience goes unmatched, this large portion of an advertiser’s audience gets zero message personalization. Add to that the lag time of waiting more than 24 hours to match the other two-thirds of their audience, and it’s clear that cookie mapping neglects an extraordinary amount of opportunity.

After much experimentation, I’ve discovered that today’s technology allows an earlier option in the process: a pre-impression request call to a DMP partner. In this scenario, user-level segment membership is passed back to the ad server, which essentially enables the identification of an audience member’s DMP profile in real time. This in turn allows for dynamic creative decisions to deliver a hypertargeted message using the most up-to-date information for 100% of a client’s DMP cookie universe.

The critical component is that nothing is being logged, just decisioned, leaving no residual drop-off from unmatched cookies. In the end, this means that every customer in the advertiser’s cookie pool will get a personalized message.

Sometimes it’s a matter of being willing to move beyond convention. This progressive systemic approach offers perfect matching rates in real time and reduces data leakage because there is no sensitive first-party data being stored by the ad server. In my experience, targeting is vastly improved, which enables more agile messaging, with practically no waste. And that is the optimal state of effectiveness and efficiency.

Follow Flashtalking (@flashtalking) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

People Inc.'s Patrick McCarthy (right) chats with Mula's Jason White at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.