Home Mobile Facebook Abandons Plan To Curb Device-Level Data Collection After Advertiser Backlash

Facebook Abandons Plan To Curb Device-Level Data Collection After Advertiser Backlash

SHARE:

device-data-fbFacebook has pulled the plug on a plan to limit device-level data collection for mobile app campaigns in the wake of a revolt by large app marketers against the policy change.

A representative for the company confirmed to AdExchanger that Facebook will no longer stop app marketers – including some of the world’s largest mobile gaming companies – from accessing information about the individual devices to which app install ads are exposed.

“While we believe device-level reporting is not the most accurate way to properly determine advertising effectiveness, we want to provide advertisers with the choice to measure ads based on what is important to them,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “In order to provide that choice, we will continue giving advertisers the option to receive device-level reporting from our mobile measurement partners for mobile app ads.”

Back in May, Facebook notified its ad buyers and mobile measurement partners that it would stop passing them campaign data linking ads to specific devices as of Aug. 20. Going forward, it said, campaign reporting for Facebook campaigns would be limited to ad- and campaign-level data. Facebook claimed this was the most effective method for driving installs anyway.

But the news didn’t sit well with many large ad buyers, who pushed back aggressively, as detailed in a VentureBeat story in July.

In particular, game makers such as Supercell and Kabam, many of whom spend millions of dollars a month to drive and optimize installs of their apps, balked at what they saw as an unfair restriction on their ability to optimize campaigns across mobile ad networks and media sources. They also feared a data power grab by Facebook, whose relationships with logged-in users across their devices is at the heart of its “people-based marketing” strategy.

For now, at least, Facebook appears to have acknowledged that its customers have a claim on some of its device information.

The first sign that Facebook’s policy shift had met with resistance came in the form of a postponement of the change’s effective date to Nov. 4. Then, as the company continued to meet with app marketers to discuss the issue, its app-install product leads decided it was time to cancel the whole plan.

Facebook continues to claim that device-level reporting is not the best way to measure and optimize for install campaigns, but that it will do to preserve choice for advertisers.

“We want advertisers to evaluate Facebook ads based on how well they’re achieving business objectives,” its statement said. “We advise our advertisers to apply people-based measurement solutions so they can determine when they’re reaching multiple people, not just multiple devices.”

Must Read

MX8 Labs Launches With A Plan To Speed Up The Survey-Based Research Biz

What’s the point of a market research survey that could take weeks, when consumer sentiment is rollercoasting up and down every day? That’s the problem MX8 Labs aims to tackle.

Closeup image bag of money and judge gavel. Lawsuit, auction, bribe and penalty concept.

The LG Ads Legal Saga Continues With A Fresh Suit, This Time Against Kroll

Alphonso co-founder Lampros Kalampoukas is suing Kroll for allegedly undervaluing the company by nearly $100 million to aid LG Electronics in a shareholder dispute.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Metric Meditations

The Startup Trying To Automate The Ad Platform Reconciliation And Refund Mess

The ad tech startup Vaudit, founded last year by Mike Hahn, aims to automate the process of campaign reconciliation atop major ad platforms.

The Trade Desk Lays Out Its Case To Beat Walled Gardens. Does Wall Street Buy It?

The Trade Desk continued its shaky 2025 earnings schedule when it reported Q2 results on Thursday.

Magnite Targets CTV, SMBs And Google's SSP Market Share

The SSP is betting on the DOJ’s antitrust remedies, plus closer relationships with agencies, DSPs and mid-sized advertisers, to help it eat some of Google’s lunch.