Home Platforms Facebook Boosts Its Ad Quality Efforts, But Can It Retain Advertiser Trust?

Facebook Boosts Its Ad Quality Efforts, But Can It Retain Advertiser Trust?

SHARE:

Facebook has been going full tilt since March to convince advertisers and consumers alike that it’s a safe platform on which to spend money and time.

On Wednesday, for example, Facebook said it’s further reducing the distribution of low-quality, spammy ads within its auction. Advertisers with multiple low-quality ads – those that contain sensational language, for example, or purposely withhold information in an effort to mislead – could see their performance plummet.

But speaking of (allegedly) withholding information in an effort to mislead, a small group of advertisers hit Facebook with a lawsuit Tuesday accusing the company of a cover-up related to its 2016 miscalculated video metrics scandal.

Remember that? At the time, Facebook admitted that it had mistakenly exaggerated reported average view times for videos for roughly two years.

The lawsuit claims that Facebook knew about the issue for at least a year before telling its advertising clients, and the overestimates were worse than Facebook admitted. Facebook had said its ad views were inflated by 60-80%, but the lawsuit asserts a range of 150-900%.

Tuesday’s complaint quotes internal Facebook documents in which Facebook supposedly resolved to “obfuscate the fact that we screwed up the math,” The Wall Street Journal reported.

The plaintiffs contend that the inflated numbers, although not a billable metric, likely persuaded advertisers to spend more on Facebook video ads because they thought the performance was better than it was.

Facebook has filed a motion to dismiss the fraud claims. A spokesperson called the lawsuit “without merit,” asserting that Facebook proactively told its customers about the error when it was discovered and didn’t try to hide the issue from partners.

But it nearly doesn’t matter whether the lawsuit has legs. It also doesn’t matter that the inflated metrics had no direct financial effect on clients.

Once trust starts to erode, the slope only gets slipperier. Advertisers must trust Facebook’s internal measures to spend with confidence.

Since the video metrics brouhaha first broke, Facebook has made changes to its measurement tools and streamlined its metrics and is undergoing a Media Rating Council audit. Facebook also formed a Measurement Council in 2016 as a forum for advertisers to communicate more closely with Facebook during the product development process.

Is it enough for advertisers to keep funneling their cash into Facebook?

Now, as was true after the Cambridge Analytica scandal broke in March, the answer is probably yes – as long as the performance is still there.

Must Read

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.

Comic: America's Mext Top AI Model

AI Is Moving Fast. The Law, Not So Much

IAPP’s Global Summit in DC was a reminder that AI is moving fast – and judges, privacy lawyers and practitioner are racing to keep up.

CIMM Is Out To Prove That All Media Isn’t Equal

An upcoming paper from CIMM doesn’t just demonstrate that differences in media quality can be measured. It also argues that tying media value to short-term outcomes has perpetuated longstanding industry challenges.