Home Ad Exchange News What Google’s Removal Of Third-Party Pixels On YouTube Means For Marketers

What Google’s Removal Of Third-Party Pixels On YouTube Means For Marketers

SHARE:

pixelAs the United States ushered in its 45th president on Friday, Google quietly ushered in a number of updates to its ad platforms.

But it was Google’s reduction of third-party cookies and pixels on YouTube, as well as the release of a cloud-based YouTube measurement system called Google Ads Data Hub, that had industry insiders scratching their heads.

To be clear, marketers can still upload their site lists/segments and target those viewers on YouTube. They just have to use Google’s identity-based, not cookie-based, tools, including Google’s Customer Match, to make an audience match via a hashed ID, or the Ads Data Hub to measure. (Google noted it would continue to work with third-party, MRC accredited measurement vendors as it builds out the new solution).

At the same time, marketers aren’t allowed to retarget YouTube user lists on third-party sites using AdWords.

In other words, data in – not out.

Google claims the elimination of third-party cookies and pixels will improve cross-screen measurement on YouTube.

Some complaints from early testers are minor. Customer Match lists are restricted to email, one source claimed, and with so much YouTube consumption happening on mobile, “then why not allow buyers/DSPs to upload mobile ad IDs the way Facebook does?”

Others, like Jenna Sheeran, SVP of search marketing for DigitasLBi, say an identity-based system will advance cross-screen measurement, but noted an issue she foresees for buyers: “It will inhibit our ability to connect data outside of Google.”

Gerry Bavaro, SVP of enterprise solutions and digital strategy for Merkle, acknowledged the same challenge: “We predict there will be [loss in] identity, measurement and targeting [compared to] what Google offers within their environment.”

Ad buyers who want a holistic view of their campaigns will need to figure out how to connect data both within and without Google’s walls.

Although YouTube’s pixel policy change will, theoretically, allow advertisers to target users across devices using Google logged-in data (and now leverage Google search data to fine-tune that targeting), some say it will come at the expense of efficiency and transparency.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

It might also fragment marketers’ horizontal attribution models.

Marketers and agencies that rely only on cookie-based DSPs and ad servers to target and measure on YouTube will lose out, said Venkat Achanta, chief data and analytics officer for Neustar and the former chief data officer of Walmart.

“To regain some of these efficiencies, marketers will need to work with independent identity providers to help them bridge and measure online and offline channels,” Achanta said.

Ric Elert, president of Conversant, shared some of Achanta’s concerns.

“Most of Google’s marketing platforms prevent independent measurement of the individual at scale,” Elert said.

“There are inherent flaws in limited measurement,” he added, “but when you are an obstacle to independent measurement entirely, you end up preventing the innovation that’s necessary to make advancements that benefit everyone in the industry, and most importantly create efficiencies for marketers.”

The Benefit

But many say the upside of Google’s people-based system outweigh the concerns.

By weaning itself from cookies, some predict Google will be able to better activate on YouTube intent data from search, behavioral data from DoubleClick, site data from Google Analytics and CRM data from Customer Match.

These developments could let Google offer better demo targeting on YouTube, “which is critical to accelerate shifts in TV budgets,” said Paul Boruta, head of ad products at YouTube branding platform, ZEFR.

A significant portion of YouTube’s audience is still anonymous. This problem, which stems from Google’s lack of a user-authenticated network like Facebook, may ease if it can infer more about an end user’s age or gender based on their intent signals (a major advantage for Facebook), Boruta predicted.

“The advertising industry is really struggling to move audience-based media strategies beyond the comfort zone of cookies, so there is clearly a market need and appetite,” noted Mike Baker, the CEO of DataXu.

These new developments with YouTube and Ads Data Hub indicate Google is “aiming to align with a limited number of tracking partners that provide value in a targeting and measurement ecosystem they’re increasingly tying back to a more deterministic identity of Google users,” Merkle’s Bavaro reiterated.

Google declined a formal interview for this report.

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.