Home Ad Exchange News Omnicom CEO Wren Discusses Agency Trading Desk Model

Omnicom CEO Wren Discusses Agency Trading Desk Model

SHARE:

On yesterday’s Omnicom Q3 earnings call with CEO John Wren and CFO Randall J. Weisenburger, the ad agency’s digital media and analytics efforts through Annalect were highlighted…. -and that’s news in itself as trading desk-related business has rarely, if ever, made an appearance on a holding company earnings call. A trend to watch for the future.

Wren said:

 “While each of our agencies is developing digital and analytical skill sets, we are also increasingly leveraging our investment in Annalect. Annalect, which includes our search business, resolution media, our mobile and display businesses, now has over 600 employees servicing clients in more than 30 markets around the world.”

The subject of agency trading desks and Omnicom’s Accuen, in particular, bubbled up at the very end of the call as BMO Capital Markets analyst Dan Salmon asked bluntly about the future.  A few key takeaways from Omicom’s execs…

  • CEO Wren sees a future where nearly all media channels are bought and sold with algos.
  • Privacy challenges persist –and it could be inferred that it inhibits growth of the trading desk model.
  • Also, CFO Weisenberger says the trading desk model at the agency is still a work-in-progress and only a couple of years old.
  • Weisenberger also notes the critical need for people who get the insights from the data as the dearth of talent in data-driven  digital and programmatic buying is a challenge for the agency let alone the rest of the ecosystem.

Here’s the transcript of the trading desk conversation:

BMO ANALYST DANIEL SALMON:

“I just want to go back to your discussion around analytics and Annalect, in particular, Accuen The Trading Desk. And some market participants have claimed maybe that The Trading Desk has become an unfortunate sort of layer in the media buying processes, programmatic becomes a small but growing part of the mix of media buying. Do you agree with that assessment? And whether or not you do, how do you see those analytics and particularly trading desk functions evolving over time? Is it to be a sort of specialized group, a SWAT team, so to speak, within OMD and PHD or is it more and more being aligned with some of your client teams directly?”

CEO JOHN WREN:

“Well, it’s clearly being aligned for the benefit of our client teams as a utility, in effect, for both our media-buying activities as well as some our other activities and campaigns. The pace at which the digital marketplace occurs and then the manner in which it’s done instead of using physical bodies, but almost through algorithms where in nanoseconds things are purchased, and then if not producing the kind of ROI, resold off back into the market, I think looking way into the future, that kind of option will occur for almost all media. But just for those the technology existed though, it doesn’t mean that it will happen overnight. It’s slow. TV is still going to get started in the same similar fashion throughout. It was once done as is outdoor, as is other major components, which are key part of the mix. So it’s a process of evolution. I think at the core of it is going to be and the determinant to where these analytics go is going to be what privacy laws have become and whether you wind up with public information, which you can access to target or do you have to build your own ability to measure consumers than to target consumers. And the question hasn’t been resolved yet. And I think it’s going to take quite a while before some of these privacy issues do get resolved and I think that will dictate a good deal of the future. The problem isn’t lack of data. There’s always been too much data. The problem is how do you make the data you have actionable and useful and where you can analyze it in a fashion that you can get insights and then act upon them in an appropriate amount of time.”

CFO RANDALL WEISENBURGER:

“Yes, I think a couple of things to add. One is to keep in mind that these trading platforms have only been around for a couple of years at this point. So the development of them and how they’re going to work out, we have to realize that they’re only a couple of years old. Frankly, being involved in them with a — there’s a huge value in learning how they can work, et cetera. On a long-term basis, it’s not really about the technology. It’s about the insights in utilizing the technology or as John points out, there’s a lot of data, but there’s limited number of people that have the ability to get real insight out of that data. That’s what our ultimate business is. Now in the early stages, we have to be somewhat the technology player, the data player because those things are all new. But on a long-term basis, it’s going to be that insight that we can bring to our clients that it’s going to make the difference.”

Read more on Seeking Alpha.

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.