Home Ad Exchange News Rubicon Accelerates Revenue Growth in Q3, Backs Away From Video

Rubicon Accelerates Revenue Growth in Q3, Backs Away From Video

SHARE:

rubiconRubicon Project’s stock rose over 20% in after hours trading following the announcement that the company posted a record quarter.

That’s good news for a supply side platform that has struggled to educate Wall Street of its value. Rubicon Project hoped its IPO would give it a market cap of $671 million. The current market cap is little more than half that, $367 million.

“To say we’re doing education is a dramatic understatement for sure,” CEO Frank Addante said. “This market is growing so fast, and it’s so dynamic, that the rate of growth is outpacing the rate of education.”

A record quarter is still relative for Rubicon Project, which went public earlier this year. But the company showed strong growth both year-over-year and compared to Q2.

Third-quarter revenue rose 60% year-over-year to $32.2 million. That’s 13% higher than last quarter, when Rubicon reported revenues of $28.3 million. That quarter also posted less growth, just 49% year over year.

The company’s managed revenues, or amount of money flowing through Rubicon’s platform, rose 43% year over year. Within that, RTB outpaced the growth of managed revenues as a whole, going up 75%. “Ongoing momentum in open RTB auction technologies” were among the factors contributing to a strong quarter, Addante said.

Within those managed revenues, mobile grew 300% year over year. Rubicon’s product includes auctions and direct orders for mobile, both on mobile web and in-app. Through its partnership with InMobi, 60 DSPs now have access to InMobi’s inventory. Rubicon said it plans to focus on native mobile in 2015.

Video is another story. After touting its beta video product last quarter, Rubicon apparently didn’t like what it saw. It says it can’t find enough quality video inventory to run through its platform. Addante expects slow growth for the time being.

“A large amount of today’s exchange video is substandard, and not acceptable,” Addante said. “We will expect more measured growth until we see more quality video inventory.”

One reason for the low quality, Addante said, stems from what its customer base isn’t selling. Rubicon targets “top 500” publishers, most of which sell all their premium video offerings directly. So while opportunity exists for Rubicon to enter video through its orders business, right now the company sees less opportunity in video exchanges.

Rubicon continued to make its pitch to investors in the call, comparing its business to the “stable and predictable” software-as-as-service businesses like Salesforce and Oracle. Addante pointed out the similarities between Rubicon and Amazon and eBay, other “marketplace” businesses that have higher take rates than financial exchanges.

Rubicon’s proof may also be in its results. It made significantly more money this quarter. Last quarter, it reported $800,000 in EBITDA. This quarter, EBITDA came out to $4.8 million.

Rubicon emphasized the stickiness of its platforms, and outlined its integration times. Sellers can take weeks to set up rules in Rubicon’s platform. Within the platform, they can compare Q4 of last year to the current year, using those insights to optimize pricing. Sellers don’t want to lose that data.

The same holds true for the other side. DSPs have to write code to connect, which requires a three month cycle of development and six months to synchronize cookies and data IDs, Rubicon said.

As the company moves into the orders business, which uses DealID, Rubicon has noticed resistance to the fact it “forces transparency,” Addante said. “We’re trying to convince these companies that transparency is good and not a threat to the industry. “A lot of the buyers of platforms are not transparent. Some of those companies are reluctant to see [transparency] happen, either because it exposes their business model, or puts the customer in direct contact with the seller.”

As Rubicon addresses the challenges within digital advertising, it also made clear it plans to automate more than just digital advertising. We see “continuing opportunity to move into adjacent markets,” Addante said, including TV, out-of-home, radio and print.

Rubicon is putting R&D dollars behind those initiatives, though Addante declined to say just how much was focused on automating advertising outside of online. “f you look at the history of our company, we invest a lot more in technology & R&D, than the ad tech companies do. Our development efforts are always focused on the future.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?