Home Ad Exchange News Rubicon Reports; Google Bans Crypto Ads

Rubicon Reports; Google Bans Crypto Ads

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Take That

Rubicon Project reported Q4 and full-year 2017 earnings Wednesday. As expected, eliminating buy-side fees took a serious bite out of its revenue. For the quarter, revenues were $31.4 million, down from $72.7 million in Q4 2016, and full-year revenues fell to $155 million from $278 million. Its take rate was 11.6%, which has remained consistent since the company eliminated buyer fees in November. Previously, take rates had been as high as 25%. “Our desire was that by eliminating buy-side fees, it would put competitors that still charge buy-side fees in an uncomfortable position and have them eliminate it as well,” Rubicon CEO Michael Barrett said on the earnings call. “We are not seeing pressure from the sell side from a rate standpoint.” Rubicon also cut $44 million in annualized spending by consolidating back-office functions, eliminating 100 positions and reducing $20 million in capital expenditures. Read the release. Its stock price jumped in after-market trading.

Tales From The Crypto

Six weeks after Facebook banned cryptocurrency-related keywords, Google has taken a similar step. Its ban on crypto-related terms and advertisers will take effect in June and will cover search, display and YouTube ads as part of a new initiative targeting “speculative financial products” including binary options and foreign exchange markets. Read the blog post by Scott Spender, Google’s director of sustainable ads. More in The Wall Street Journal. The change comes a week after the SEC called out online platforms for enabling unlawful digital trading of assets and information.

Trade Wars

Digital Content Next, an online publishing trade group, sent an email cautioning members from participating in the GDPR cookie consent framework opened to public review last week by the IAB, which finalizes next month [AdExchanger has more on that]. The framework “was clearly designed by ad tech companies and included endorsement from 23 ad tech companies and, most notably, zero publishers,” writes DNC CEO Jason Kint in the email, obtained by AdExchanger. The IAB framework envisions publishers opting in to a program where advertising intermediaries could target users across sites under a single consent agreement. Limiting ad personalization and targeting would bring down inventory rates, argue IAB proponents. The DCN is pushing publishers to try building “new demand through context and true relevance.”

Throwing A Bone

To help publishers retain more paying readers, Google will prioritize news organizations to which users subscribe higher in their search results, Bloomberg reports. Google’s parent, Alphabet, will also share search data with publishers to help them target users most likely to buy a subscription. The news follows Google’s decision to abandon its “first click free” policy, which penalized publishers with paywalled articles in their search rankings. Publishers are increasingly pushing platforms to help them gain paying subscribers but are still struggling to make meaningful revenue through their distribution. More.

But Wait, There’s More!

You’re Hired!

Must Read

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.

Can E.L.F. Cosmetics Become A Consumer Destination, Not Just A Brand?

History can be a burden for a brand, if it means that company is too set in its ways to pivot and try new things. Just consider e.l.f. Cosmetics, the digitial-first, social-native brand that made good.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Digital-native brands need to figure out how to win in retail shelves. They're finding it difficult, to say the least.

DTC Brands Are Learning The Hard Way That Winning In Retail Can Be A Losing Bet

Digital-native brands need to figure out how to win in retail shelves. They’re finding it difficult, to say the least.

Browser Extension Developers Say Google And Apple Need CMA Oversight

A group of 20 web app developers sent a letter to the CMA claiming the regulator’s proposed remedies for increasing competition among mobile browsers do not address barriers to entry for mobile web extensions on iOS and Android.

A comic depicting people walking past digital billboard screens in a city

TikTok Wants To Win All The Screens, Not Just Your Smartphone

“There are billions of additional screens outside of mobile phones,” says Dan Page, TikTok’s global head of partnerships and new screens. “We want to be in all of them.”