Home Ad Exchange News Bloomberg Shells Out $10 Million For Anti-Trump Super Bowl Ad; Tivo Enters The Streaming Wars

Bloomberg Shells Out $10 Million For Anti-Trump Super Bowl Ad; Tivo Enters The Streaming Wars

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Bloomberg’s Big Play

Presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg is set to unload a 60-second ad spot critical of President Donald Trump in the upcoming Super Bowl. The New York Times estimates that the former NYC mayor shelled out $10 million for the privilege, also noting Bloomberg’s record-setting spend on political advertising, which is up near $170 million across TV and digital. The Super Bowl is an unconventional ad forum for a presidential candidate. Most White House aspirants focus on the swing states. But, according to University of San Francisco professor Ken Goldstein, it’s a smart move for Bloomberg, who’s running a national campaign. “As expensive as it is, it’s cheaper than buying the ads market by market,” Goldstein told the Times. More.

You Stream, I Stream

TiVo unveiled a “tiny little HDMI puck” at CES that’s designed to provide streaming and live TV content. Dubbed the TiVo Stream 4K, this device makes TiVo the newest entrant into 2020’s streaming wars. Users will get access to a bunch of streaming apps, such as Netflix and HBO, and to content from Tivo Plus, Tivo’s free, ad-supported movie and TV service. The live TV component comes with cloud-based DVR. The TiVo Stream, according to TechCrunch’s Anthony Ha, is also highly personalized in that users can navigate based on shows, instead of having to move between different apps. No word on what this means for advertising, but the puck certainly seems like a device with the potential to capture some pretty powerful insights into the viewing behaviors of TiVo’s audience. More.

FakeBook

Facebook claims it’s cracking down on deep fakes and manipulated media to try and dampen the spread of misinformation during the presidential election – but it’s an uphill battle. In a blog post on Monday, Facebook’s VP of global policy management, Monika Bickert, said that video content will be booted from the platform if it’s been edited in a way that’s likely to mislead the viewer. Videos will also be removed if they’ve been edited or computer generated in ways an average viewer can’t detect. The policy, however, doesn’t cover satire, parodies or videos that were only edited to either cut out or change the order of words. These exceptions to the rule, while necessary, muddy the waters. What, for example, should be considered parody and what is manipulation? Sounds like it’s going to be up to fact-checkers to decide. Facebook was criticized for refusing to take down a video last summer that was altered to make House Speaker Nancy Pelosi look as if she were slurring her speech. Facebook down-ranked the doctored video rather than actually removing it.

SCOTUS Says

Google fired the first salvo in its Supreme Court case involving Oracle over whether Android violated copyright laws by reusing Java code, a popular and partially open-source developer language, for its mobile operating system. “For decades, computer scientists have built on each others’ work, drawing on shared foundations of knowledge and the compatibility of interfaces that allow developers to create applications available on a variety of devices and platforms,” argued Google’s counsel in its first filing to the high court on Monday. (Here’s the full brief.) After all, the original Java slogan, when the code was operated by Sun Microsystems, was “write once, run anywhere.” Oracle will file its response next month, reports Law360. The dispute has bounced through court systems for almost a decade, with Google winning a jury decision but then losing a Federal Court appeal. Once the Supreme Court reaches its decision, the case could have important ramifications for open-source code and IP, as well as how developers operate across major platform APIs.

But Wait, There’s More

You’re Hired

Must Read

A man talking to a robot

How Red Roof Is Bringing In More Customers With Zeta’s Voice-Activated AI Agent

Hotel chain Red Roof is using Zeta’s new voice-activated AI agent to guide its campaign creation, deployment timing and audience development.

Jean-Paul Schmetz, Chief of Ads, Brave

Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads

Brave’s chief of ads Jean-Paul Schmetz on competition in the search and browser markets, the fallout from the Google Search antitrust ruling and whether AI search will help smaller upstarts compete with Big Tech.

Vizio Helps Walmart Cut A Bigger Slice Of The CTV Ad Pie

Walmart and Vizio announced at NewFronts that unified account logins are coming to smart TVs using Vizio’s operating system.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: CTV Tracking

Carl’s Jr. And Hardee’s Marketing Goes Regional With Amazon Ads’ Streaming Media

The age-old question for streaming TV advertisers is, how to target the viewers they want while reaching the scale their businesses need. The quick-serve restaurant operator CKE, which owns Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s, sought an answer in a case study with Attain and Amazon Ads.

Cartoon of a woman in an apron cooking vegetables on a stovetop, holding a ladle as if to taste her creation

America’s Test Kitchen Puts Direct And Programmatic Access On Its Menu

America’s Test Kitchen introduced direct and programmatic buying for its free ad-supported TV channels – marking the first time it’s selling ad inventory as a standalone package.

The Rise Of Principal Media And The End Of The Agencies As We Knew Them

Ad agency holding companies are among the most adaptable businesses out there. In recent years holdcos like Publicis, WPP and Omnicom-IPG have stretched our notions of what an agency business even is exactly.