Home AdExchanger Talks Doing The Math On Privacy Compliance

Doing The Math On Privacy Compliance

SHARE:
Fiona Campbell-Webster, chief privacy officer, MediaMath

CCPA, CPRA, VCDPA, UCPA, CPA, CPDPA …

It’s hard enough keeping track of the acronyms for state-based privacy laws in the US, let alone complying with them.

And the operational challenges of compliance only get trickier as more states pass data protection and privacy laws of their own. (Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Ohio have privacy bills in committee.)

“It’s a lot to take in,” says MediaMath’s chief privacy officer, Fiona Campbell-Webster, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

But compliance means paying attention to the details.

For example, what are the commonalities between these laws? Which aspects of a company’s existing compliance program can be repurposed? Is there any overlap between new laws in the US and work that’s been done already to comply with GDPR in Europe? Are there new contractual requirements based on whether a business is considered a third party or a service provider?

The industry has been working on standards for compliance.

The IAB Tech Lab, for instance, recently released the first version of its Global Privacy Platform, which is a protocol for transmitting consent and choice signals across the supply chain. For now, it’s only available for CPRA in California, with plans to add other states soon.

But some industry observers are critical that any approach modeled on the embattled Transparency & Consent Framework in Europe, as the Global Privacy Platform is, won’t be viable in the long term.

Earlier this year, the Belgian data protection authority deemed the TCF to be illegal in its current form and gave IAB Europe six months to overhaul it, which is a heavy lift.

But Campbell-Webster, a self-described “optimist by nature,” is betting on a successful revamp.

The IAB is “working very carefully on that at the moment … with the view in mind that if the issues are fixed, it could likely become a code of conduct,” Campbell-Webster says, “which would be very helpful for everyone in the industry.”

Also this episode: Handling sensitive data categories following the overturn of Roe v. Wade, the over/under on whether the US will finally get a federal privacy law and Campbell-Webster’s journey from classically trained opera singer to attorney with an interest in privacy and ad tech.

For more articles featuring Fiona Campbell-Webster, click here.

Must Read

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.

Comic: America's Mext Top AI Model

AI Is Moving Fast. The Law, Not So Much

IAPP’s Global Summit in DC was a reminder that AI is moving fast – and judges, privacy lawyers and practitioner are racing to keep up.