Home Advertiser Concerned With Transparency, More Marketers Take Programmatic Strategy In-House

Concerned With Transparency, More Marketers Take Programmatic Strategy In-House

SHARE:

More marketers are moving programmatic strategy in-house, pushing agencies into an executional role, according to a study released by the Association of National Advertisers on Monday.

Most marketers approach in-housing in a hybrid fashion, splitting responsibilities between their internal team and an external agency partner. Marketers increasingly are taking responsibility for strategy while agencies serve a “button-pushing” role, the ANA found.

In a survey of 149 marketers, 35% of respondents told the ANA they have reduced the work they outsource to agencies as a result of expanding their in-house programmatic capabilities. That figure is up from 14% in 2016.

“This confirms that marketers are taking more control of programmatic,” said Bill Duggan, group EVP at the ANA. “The wave has started.”

Sixty-nine percent of marketers, for example, handle strategy and campaign direction in-house. Most marketers have at least one staff member who dedicates 100% of their time to programmatic. And 47% of marketers own their technology contracts, while 43% leave contract ownership to their agencies.

Meanwhile, just 11% of marketers have taken campaign execution in-house. That’s a shift from in-housing models of the past, where agencies would handle strategic work and marketers would take lower-level functions like collateral in-house as a cost-cutting measure, Duggan said.

“Increasingly, we’ve heard that the talent at in-house agencies produce good work,” he said. “Agencies are continually challenged to show their value in a world of hyperfragmentation.”

Still, most agencies retain the reporting and analytics functions that come hand-in-hand with programmatic. Fifty-four percent of marketers leave audience planning to agencies, while 78% let agencies handle post-campaign reporting and 73% let agencies do analysis during campaigns.

But marketers should be wary of jumping into a fully in-sourced model. While taking programmatic in-house is viable for big brands like L’Oreal, Netflix and EA, most marketers – especially smaller ones – will struggle without help from an agency, Duggan said.

“Movement of programmatic in-house has been thoughtful and concentrated among bigger clients because there is a fair amount of infrastructure internally that needs to be assembled,” he said. “It’s not for the faint of heart.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Opacity Persists

Marketers are adopting in-house programmatic functions more quickly mainly due to continued concerns about transparency and brand safety.

According to Monday’s report, just 40% of marketers are “comfortable or very comfortable” with the transparency of their programmatic buys, with a third stating they are “uncomfortable or very uncomfortable” with programmatic due to hidden costs, an excess of middlemen and little to no insight on where their ads run. Seventy-eight percent said they are “concerned or very concerned” about brand safety in programmatic.

“I have a lack of understanding of the day-to-day management of our programmatic spend with agencies and lack of transparency into optimization and planning,” one marketer told the ANA.

As a result, marketers are opting against nondisclosed buys. Nineteen percent of marketers surveyed have a nondisclosed programmatic model with their agency, down from 34% last year.

“There still are transparency concerns with programmatic,” Duggan said. “The reason why anything would move in-house would be increased transparency, and what’s associated with increased transparency is likely lower costs.”

If marketers do opt in to a nondisclosed agency relationship, they should work provisions into their contracts demanding access to log-level data for programmatic buys. So far, not enough marketers are asking for this level of insight, Duggan said.

“Most don’t know to ask, and only few are doing it,” he said. “At this point we’re simply trying to drive awareness.”

Despite concerns with the programmatic supply chain, marketers are shifting more dollars to the medium because it offers better audience targeting, the ability to build reach and real-time optimization. Of the marketers surveyed, 85% are buying programmatically.

“Efficiency and targetability have certainly accelerated the growth of programmatic,” Duggan said. “More marketers are becoming comfortable with programmatic, but it takes a while to get there.”

Must Read

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

Retail Media Is Starting To Come To Grips With The Fact That We All Know Nothing

Retail media is entering what might be called its Socratic phase. The closer we to get to understanding an ad campaign’s real impact and business results, the clearer it is that we have no idea how this thing works.

Meta Reels trending ads

Meta Has New Tools For Brand And Performance Goals, With A Focus On AI (Of Course)

Meta is rolling out Reels trending ads, value rules beyond just conversions, upgrades to Threads and pixel-free landing page optimization.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Google Search Ads 360 Adds Criteo As First On-Site Retail Media Supply Partner

Criteo announced a partnership with Google Search Ads 360 (SA360), Google’s enterprise search advertising platform, making Criteo the first third-party vendor to integrate with Google for on-site retail media supply.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Minute Media’s Latest Acquisition Brings Automated Content Creation To Its Online Sports Video Network

As display falters, Minute Media is acquiring AI tech that cuts longer-form video content and full-length games into bite-size clips.

With GAM Going Direct To Buyers, SPO Is The New Normal

GAM’s dinner with ad agencies sparked speculation that Google is preparing to spin off its bundled SSP and ad server as a remedy to its ad tech monopoly. But Google says it’s just part of the trend of SSPs going direct to buyers.

Google’s Proposed Fix To Its Ad Tech Monopoly Is At Odds With The DOJ’s Remedies

Late Friday evening, Google filed its proposed remedies to its ad tech monopoly to District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema, and unsurprisingly, they’re rather mild – and very different from what the Department of Justice is looking for.