Home Advertiser RampUp: Blood, Sweat And Tears As Major Marketers Transform From The Ground Up

RampUp: Blood, Sweat And Tears As Major Marketers Transform From The Ground Up

SHARE:

ryan-rampupThe move to one-to-one advertising requires a tech and data overhaul that’s immensely challenging – even when marketers have clear goals and executive buy-in.

Marketers from Nordstrom, Sears and Lowe’s articulated their ongoing transformations on Tuesday during panel discussions at LiveRamp’s annual RampUp conference in San Francisco.

Sears Chief Digital and Marketing Analytics Officer Kerem Tomak arrived at the company about two years ago to help upgrade the company’s entire digital marketing stack, from data and analytics to execution.

“If you’ve ever dealt with attribution, you know how hard it is to transition from a world where everyone is double- or triple-counted to looking instead at their added value,” he said.

But the change was necessary to do one-to-one marketing and move from analyzing audiences to assessing how single users track to traditional KPIs, such as online or offline conversions.

Nordstrom, meanwhile, spent the last three years building personalization technologies, said Jason Gowans, the store’s VP of marketing analytics and tech.

“There was a big opportunity to make marketing more personalized,” Gowans said. “The other piece is making marketing more efficient, measuring marketing and transparency across the value chain.”

The home improvement giant Lowe’s undertook a massive effort to bring more of its marketing stack in-house because otherwise it would have needed to rebuild if it ever changed agencies, said digital media manager Katie Morrissey.

Lowe’s infrastructure needs are complex. Morrissey wants to be able to design personalized marketing and figure out how online media drives in-store traffic. And she wants tech that’s both flexible and predictive.

“We’re designing our road map to be flexible and to change over the course of 2017,” Morrissey said. “As we start to organize around a customer, you have to be able to change all the time.”

The need to overhaul a marketing apparatus often stems from a deeper business transformation. Nordstrom, for instance, decided it wanted to be a growth business and set a goal of becoming a $20 billion retailer by 2020. Until recently, Nordstrom had focused on its existing customers, but it wouldn’t have hit its goal unless it started acquiring new ones.

Under CMO Scott Meden, appointed to the role last summer, Nordstrom did a hard reset with its measurement objectives.

“Up until last year, we were measuring on the basis of seven-day and last-day attribution, so we’d end up going after our existing customers,” Gowans said. “Eighty percent of our [advertising] spend went to existing customers.”

Nordstrom’s goals now center around customer acquisitions, cost of acquisition and loyalty penetration, none of which Nordstrom previously considered. That meant a reorg of the marketing group, which used to be organized around channel but is now split between customer acquisition and retention. While there’s overlap, customer retention focuses on more traditional programs, such as loyalty and direct mail, whereas acquisition is more focused on digital.

Lowe’s also moved from a channel-based strategy. Cowie used to perform tests and controls for individual digital channels, but those tests were expensive, slow and hard to replicate since customers moved around and digital environments changed a lot. “We needed to identify the right moment – it’s not about the channel or creative,” she said.

But reorgs are hard – even when they lead to business success.

Morrissey, for instance, enlisted numerous departments across Lowe’s to help design a “cool product” to connect online media with offline point-of-sale purchases. But it wasn’t celebrated.

“I started to become a little feared,” she said. “When we’re trying new products and innovation, we have to interrupt everyone else’s day jobs to get that done. And that’s hard for a big company with limited resources.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.

Predict Bowl Icon. Magician Element, Forecasting Symbol – Vector.

Why This Marketing Measurement Company Just Open-Sourced Its Forecasting Engine

MMM can tell marketers what worked, but Lifesight’s open-sourced forecasting tool aims to tell them what to do next.