Home Agencies Where Does The Agency Of The Future Draw The Line – Omnicom’s Annalect CEO Hagedorn

Where Does The Agency Of The Future Draw The Line – Omnicom’s Annalect CEO Hagedorn

SHARE:

agency-tech-servicesOur series continues as AdExchanger reached out to several executives from the agency side of the ecosystem and asked the following question:

“Given the increasing complexity of ad technology needed to service clients – particularly in digital media buying -, and ad tech companies need to build a service layer to activate its tech, where does the agency of the future draw the line for its own services? Does the agency become a ‘sourcing master’, if you will?”

Scott Hagedorn, CEO, Annalect, (Omnicom) answered:

‘I see three things happening in the space. The first one is that – especially on my side of the business – we’ve had to get proactive on becoming the Consumer Reports, if you will, on all the various ad tech providers from those in data sourcing and strategic data transformation all the way through to reporting, visualization, buying, activation, planning – all of it. For some clients the concept of either having an IBM, Adobe or a Google stack starts with their web analytics product, and fuses all the way up through buying into planning and maybe some more other media oriented planning technologies. It is a very alluring proposition.

Those stacks, all don’t completely work right now on an automated basis. But in the future, I’ve see a lot of those things starting to come together.

The way we’re handling it is that, one, we publish a Consumer Reports like document in some of these different horizontal category areas on features, functionality and interoperability. Then concurrent with that, we are setting up a managed services arm that – in case a client wants to deploy and test an integrated vertical stack – we would be able to manage it on their behalf.

AdExchanger: Thoughts on ‘sourcing master’?

‘Sourcing master,’ systems integrator, ad tech integrator… ‘Sourcing master’ is an interesting way to look at it. Our personal point of view is still we should take a best of breed systems integration approach and help clients to source the tech and put multiple technologies together. Our goal is to drive a set of open standards to the marketplace, so everything will be interoperable.”

Read more:

 

By John Ebbert

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)