Home Daily News Roundup Disney Premieres Anti-Password Sharing; No Sense Battling The Bots

Disney Premieres Anti-Password Sharing; No Sense Battling The Bots

SHARE:
Comic: A Brief History of Search

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

What’s The Password?

The Mouse House meant what it said about banning password sharing.

Starting Nov. 1, Disney+ will bounce subscribers off shared accounts in Canada, with other markets sure to follow, CNET reports. The company sent an email last week alerting Canadian subscribers to the new policy, with the account limited to household members only.

It’s still unclear how Disney will enforce the new rules, but clearly it’s taking inspiration from Netflix, which did similar anti-password sharing tactics in Canada before rolling them out to the US earlier this year. 

Both streaming giants are trying to push more subscribers to their brand-new ad-supported tiers either by blocking account hangers-on or by raising ad-free prices. Starting next week, Disney will raise prices for ad-free tiers on both Disney+ and Hulu by $3 per month as an actual deterrent to its subscription revs – because knocking them into the ad-supported tier brings higher average revenue per user.

Leaving little left to question about its intentions with anti-account sharing, Disney is launching Disney+ with ads in Canada on the same day.

Can’t Stop The Bots

Some publishers believe that resistance is futile when it comes to generative AI bots soaking up their content. But they aren’t giving the farm away without a fight, Digiday reports.

More than 240 of the internet’s top 1,000 sites have blocked OpenAI’s ChatGPT web crawler from scraping their sites. 

In private conversations, though, publishers say such efforts are essentially “symbolic.” After all, the same content is available on other channels, such as news aggregators, email newsletters and content syndication apps.

Plus, publishers are reluctant to disable Google and Microsoft bots for generative AI since doing so would de-index their sites from search.

However, Google and Microsoft aren’t taking a completely oppositional stance. 

Google is giving publishers more control over what content they can allow to be scraped by AI and the contexts in which that content can be used. Microsoft introduced a site-crawler compromise by introducing tags at the page level, which means things like headlines or abstracts might be passed to the search engine while the whole article can’t be scraped. 

All Your Usage Base Belongs To Us

Marketers that develop a reliance on generative AI tech should know that the other shoe has yet to drop. And that shoe is called “usage-based pricing.” 

Generative AI is popular because it’s new, cool and useful. Advertisers, ad tech and publishers have rushed headlong into generative AI, mainly because it saves time and money (and it’s a useful trick for product placement). 

But it’s also artificially cheap. The costs for OpenAI enterprise accounts and usage for similar AI services across the board are deflated because those companies are in early growth mode. Uber and Lyft likewise had lower prices than taxis for years – while they were supported by investor cash – before rationalizing their prices for profit and costing about the same as a normal cab.  

The Information reports that the GenAI inflection point is almost here, and startups are trying to shift from payments by account seat to usage-based pricing. 

And other SaaS vendors are switching to usage-based pricing, too. Otherwise, they could be charging customers per account seat while swallowing the fast-growing costs of data consumption.

But Wait, There’s More!

Reddit will no longer let you opt out of personalized ads. [The Verge]

Dentsu wants keyword-based contextual targeting and brand safety controls in CTV. [Ad Age]

BeReal denies that it’s losing steam. [TechCrunch]

The Anti-Defamation League releases a report on ads appearing next to hateful content on social platforms, with YouTube standing out as the worst offender. [release]

Must Read

Readers Are Flocking To Political News, Says WaPo – And Advertisers Are Missing Out

During certain periods this year, advertisers blocked more than 40% of The Washington Post’s inventory over brand safety concerns.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Spicy Quotes You’ll Be Quoting From The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

A lot has already been said and cited during the Google ad tech antitrust trial, with more to come. Here are a few of the most notable quotables from the first two weeks.

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)