Home Daily News Roundup Judge Rules Google Search Is A Monopoly; NVIDIA’s Unreleased AI Scrapes The Web

Judge Rules Google Search Is A Monopoly; NVIDIA’s Unreleased AI Scrapes The Web

SHARE:
Comic: The Showdown (Google vs. DOJ)

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Trust Issues

Google Search is officially a monopoly.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled on Monday that Google has been operating an illegal monopoly over online search for years, Politico reports.

In a 286-page ruling, Mehta says Google is a monopolist in part because it maintains 90% of the search market through exclusive search provider agreements with mobile carriers and device makers, including Apple, Samsung and Verizon. Google paid billions per year to keep these agreements in effect.

Google also used its dominance of the search advertising market to fend off challenges from Microsoft, one of its chief competitors, Mehta ruled. However, he stopped short of saying Google has a monopoly over search advertising.

It remains unclear what methods the government will pursue to rectify Google’s search monopoly. That will require separate legal proceedings. But Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Jonathan Kanter has voiced support for “structural remedies” that could include breaking off parts of Google’s business.

Google plans to appeal the ruling.

But the decision will no doubt bolster related efforts to crack down on Big Tech monopolies, since it proves existing antitrust law applies in the internet era. Next up is another Google trial centering on its programmatic ad tech, which is set to begin in September. The US also has pending antitrust cases against Apple, Meta and Amazon.

Scrape, Baby, Scrape

Internal documents leaked to 404 Media reveal that Nvidia has been scraping video content from YouTube, Netflix and other digital sources to train its AI.  

Described as “a video data factory that can yield a human lifetime visual experience worth of training data per day” by an Nvidia higher-up, the “Cosmos” project was intended as a foundational AI model for several products, including even self-driving car systems.

Obviously this reopens previous ethical and legal arguments about downloading and using copyrighted content in AI training data sets (YouTube calls this type of scraping a “clear violation” of its terms of use), but it also begs the question: Can we trust AI companies when they say their products are compliant with copyright laws?

As this newsletter previously covered, many advertising agencies are still hesitant to use AI tools without first confirming that their own data will not be used as a training source. More negative press like this won’t exactly inspire confidence in these tools going forward – to say nothing of the many lawsuits now being filed against AI companies, Nvidia included. 

Ditto

Warner Bros. Discovery’s flagship service Max just launched a new homepage personalization feature for all US accounts. WBD started rolling it out gradually in December – and it’s awfully similar to the content recommendation setup on Netflix, The Verge reports. 

Based on viewing history and consumption patterns, Max now recommends titles in content rows that take over the entire homepage, not just part of it. Max also suppresses titles it doesn’t think a subscriber would be interested in.

Homepage personalization is one tactic streamers are using to increase time spent on their apps, which can raise ad revenue. But another popular strategy for streamers like Max is copying Netflix, which is steadily growing both ad-supported subscribers and ad revenue.

Shortly after Netflix touted all the paid accounts it gained from banning password sharing, for example, Max (and Disney+) announced plans to do the same. And going forward, WBD plans to include more features on Max that encourage user engagement, such as buttons viewers can use to rank the shows they “like” or “love” – which Netflix has been doing for at least two years.

But Wait, There’s More!

Ari Paparo offers a history lesson on how Google built an ads business that’s drawing antitrust scrutiny. [LinkedIn]

The ad job market in New York City is booming – but is that hurting other cities? [Ad Age]

Olympics ads just aren’t hitting like they used to. [The Drum]

The Olympics is increasingly relying on advertising – not media rights – to pay the bills. [Digiday]

What marketers need to know about principal media buying. [WSJ]

Petitioners in Israel drop a class-action lawsuit accusing Bright Data of scraping kids’ data from social media. [Bloomberg]

Must Read

Pacvue Enters The Next Chapter Of Retail Media With New CEO Rahul Choraria

Pacvue has promoted COO Rahul Choraria to chief executive.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.