Home Daily News Roundup Google Paid Advertisers To Buy Certain Media Types; Brand Safety Is Ruining The News

Google Paid Advertisers To Buy Certain Media Types; Brand Safety Is Ruining The News

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Rebate and Switch

There’s already a lot to sift through among the many recently unsealed documents for the DOJ’s antitrust trial against Google – but one interesting tidbit has already surfaced. Namely, Google’s plan to pay agencies for purchasing certain types of media.

As Adweek reports, Google’s media rebate program wasn’t a secret. As AdExchanger reported at the time, it’s been around since at least 2016. (It’s not clear whether it still exists today.) But some of the finer details of that program – which included discounts, cash back and other financial incentives – haven’t been publicly available until now.

The documents outline both the types of media Google wanted to boost and how much it was willing to pay to advertisers in 2018, which was around $445 million total across several incentive programs.  

Adweek’s sources theorize that these documents will serve as proof that Google has concrete, quantifiable influence over how brand media budgets are spent. However, we won’t know for sure what the DOJ’s plans are until the trial begins in earnest on September 9.

The Safety Dance

Cancel culture is ruining the media business, Business Insider reports – but not in the way you may think.

Brand safety concerns are having a noticeable financial impact on publishers that post anything other than feel-good fluff pieces.

What’s more, this issue cuts across both sides of the political aisle. Media buyers are afraid of enraging conservatives by appearing to care about things like diversity or LGBTQ people, but in 2016 it was liberal organizations leading boycotts against advertisers appearing on alt-right websites.

It’s gotten to the point that Time Magazine reportedly lost ad revenue on its 2023 Person of the Year feature – arguably the thing Time is best known for – because its subject, pop star Taylor Swift, talked about feminism in the interview.

Clearly, something needs to change. But so far the best anybody can come up with is forcing advertisers to spend money equally across right- and left-leaning publications, which would probably just make everybody mad.

Moderation In Moderation

Here’s another sign that brand safety and content moderation have become politicized: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologized to Republicans in Congress for his company’s attempts to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election, The Washington Post reports.

Zuckerberg sent a letter to Republican Congressman Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, saying that Meta was “repeatedly pressured” by the Biden administration to censor certain content on its platforms related to the pandemic and also content about that now-infamous laptop owned by President Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

Zuckerberg says he believes it was “wrong” of the Biden administration to call for the removal of certain posts, echoing Republican criticisms. However, Zuckerberg stressed that any content moderation decisions were ultimately made by Meta.

The letter is Meta’s first public response to a lawsuit brought by 19 Republican attorneys general, charging that the Biden administration illegally pressured social platforms to censor conservative speech under the guise of fighting misinformation.

Going forward, Meta will wait to make a final determination as to whether a post contains misinformation before deprioritizing it, rather than proactively suppressing potentially false content.

Critics warn this change will allow falsehoods to flourish during the 2024 election. But House Judiciary Republicans trumpeted Meta’s decision as a “big win for free speech.”

But Wait, There’s More!

Surprise, ad industry professionals! According to a new study, you’re all depressed! [Campaign

Some websites are still tracking people who said they don’t want to be tracked. [Adweek

Gannett, accused last year of publishing AI-generated content on Reviewed.com, is shutting the entire site down. [The Verge]

Here’s a rare digital media success story: Gary Vaynerchuk-owned Gallery Media Group has been profitable since 2011 and expects to end this year with $50 million in revenue, mostly from sponsored social content. [Axios]

You’re Hired!

Goodway Group hires Rick Watrall as chief data and analytics officer. [release]

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.