Home Data-Driven Thinking Cookie Wars: How Audience Targeting Is Creating Intense Competition For Cookies

Cookie Wars: How Audience Targeting Is Creating Intense Competition For Cookies

SHARE:

“Data Driven Thinking” is a new column written by members of the media community and containing fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

James Lancelot of Invite MediaToday’s column is written by James Lancelot, Director of Professional Services at Invite Media, a buy-side optimization platform.

In recent years, the traditional agency strategy for DR campaigns has been to work with multiple ad network partners to ensure that their advertiser’s campaign is getting maximum reach. This also can limit an agency’s risk, because if one ad network partner performs poorly, they can be removed from the plan. Being in this position incentivizes the ad network to maintain a high level of performance and service to the agency. The problem with this model however, is that over the past few years more and more unique inventory has been moving away from ad networks and into ad exchanges. In fact, it is rare today to find an ad network that is not doing some kind of exchange inventory buying, and many exclusively buy off of ad exchanges.

The Shift To Audience Targeting

As has been talked about many times on this blog, a major shift is happening currently in the industry away from buying “inventory,” and moving towards buying “audiences.” Remarketing and 3rd party data targeted campaigns are driving this shift due to their strong performance and the branding impact of knowing a user’s interest or profile. Don’t get me wrong, inventory, context, creative, etc still all play a strong role, but the focus has very much shifted to “How do we get in front of our users?” on the best inventory and make it scale.

From a technical perspective, buying audiences means bidding on users, and how you bid on a user is based off of the cookies that have been dropped on that user’s computer. As everyone knows, these cookie “drop points” occur from an advertisers site or from a data provider through their publishers or some other proprietary system. Getting back in front of those users requires simply that you bid for the right to serve them an ad impression through any of the various exchanges when that said cookie pops up again.

Cookie Wars

This is where the old model of buying inventory is going to begin to directly conflict with buying audiences. The challenge is that for most advertisers (and data providers), audiences are finite. And because buying audiences (especially remarketing) is the “lowest hanging fruit” strategy for an agency to drive performance, their natural instinct is to work with multiple ad networks to “drive scale.” This is fine when an advertising campaign is run through one ad network or platform, but that is typically not the case. A single ad network with access to the exchanges can hit close to 100% of a unique audience in a given month.

Because the old model of working with multiple ad networks on a given campaign is still very much in full force, and the audience is finite, the “cookie wars” are ensuing. There are a few large exchanges that a significant number of ad networks work on, and they all bid for the same cookied users.

The Impact On Advertiser ROI

What is happening (all too often) is an agency will contract with 10+ ad networks (sometimes more), many of which are on all of the ad exchanges, and they all bid for the same cookied users. Not wanting to be the lowest on the totem pole in terms of delivery and scale, the ad networks raise their bids to ensure they win enough impressions. Consequently the price of that user to the advertiser gets inflated due to increased competitiveness in bidding. Furthermore, because the various networks are competing over the same cookie pool, and are not running through one centralized platform, they can’t have a universal frequency per user. This, as you can imagine, turns into extreme waste for the agency and their advertiser.

A Centralized Solution

The industry is rapidly combating the aforementioned problem, for one, with centralized platform buying solutions. Agencies are getting much smarter and creating internal teams that manage bids and frequencies universally using such platforms. But there is still a long way to go, a lot of education, and consolidation that will need to happen. As agencies and their advertisers continue to evolve their thinking and strategies, it is going to be an exciting time as buying consolidates and advertisers really start to see strong performance on their campaigns.

Follow Invite Media (@invitemedia) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger.com) on Twitter.com.

Must Read

WPP’s Angela Steele On AI, CTV And The ‘Trusted Growth Partner’ Pitch

AI is taking over the media and tech industries in the name of simplification, and marketers are pining for provable campaign outcomes, including from TV. These shifts are also causing significant change in Agency Holdco Land, according to Angela Steele, the first chief client officer for WPP Media US.

Shopify Noses Further Into Ad Tech With Campaign Autopilot Expansion

No major retail media player has taken as circumspect an approach to ad revenue as Shopify. But the company has recently taken its next important step with a product called Campaign Autopilot.

Benji Shomair, VP of monetization, OpenAI & Terry Kawaja, CEO, LUMA Partners (photo credit: Jenna Bascom Photography / LUMA Partners)

In OpenAI’s Ad Business, Advertisers Come Third

OpenAI’s head of monetization, Benji Shomair makes the case for ads as a way to bring ChatGPT to more people, with user trust taking priority over advertiser demands.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Trade Desk’s Revenue Slipped In Q3. If It Wants To Grow, It Must Evolve

In Q3, The Trade Desk beat the admittedly pessimistic revenue forecast it set for itself earlier this year. But growth has stalled.

Human artist painting on canvas, while beside him an AI robot stands copying the artwork onto its own canvas. Depict the controversy surrounding Generative AI and the creativity of human artists

Viant Buys Waymark For $20 Million, Because CTV Needs More Ads (More!)

Viant is doubling down on CTV with its $20 million Waymark acquisition, betting that AI-generated ads can bring more advertisers to streaming TV.

Smart AI Chatbot Virtual Assistant Vector Icon design

TIME’s AI Agents Do The Coordinating, And Its Sellers Still Do The Selling

TIME is using AI agents to draft proposals and troubleshoot campaigns – but not to replace the human relationships that drive ad sales.