Home Data-Driven Thinking Direct Dialing Intent

Direct Dialing Intent

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking“Data-Driven Thinking” is a column written by members of the media community and containing fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Jonathan Mendez, founder of Yieldbot.

One of the most exciting and disruptive things going on right now in digital media is the rise of new businesses harvesting intent and making it available for advertisers outside the confines of Google.  Companies are building demand capture systems for advertisers that sit in other parts of the web ecosystem outside the Search appliance. These are truly new and vast marketplaces that can more directly connect consumers to relevant messaging.

Intellectually we know that Google neither creates nor fulfills intent. Google sits as a switchboard operator routing it and collecting a service fee to route it more directly and with more volume to your business. Google makes roughly $20B a year in Search advertising (2010) because technology has not advanced enough to remove the need for a switchboard. That will change.

The interesting thing about switchboard operators is that they eventually became unnecessary. Technology advanced in ways that could bypass them. With direct dial parties became able to connect directly to each other without the need for a switchboard. While directories like The Yellow Pages and 411 were large businesses (until they too got disrupted) direct dial gave rise to a new businesses model once a city got an area code. Automatically connecting those codes (long distance) ultimately proved to be more a much more lucrative business. That is what’s happening here.

As more directed ad calls based on intent are made the value of intent increases and new value is created. That’s the most amazing part. The decentralization of intent just like that of phone companies will create new players in various regions of the web. And just like the rise in direct dial for cities, channels that don’t have this technology will miss out. Montreal didn’t have direct dial service until 1958, 7 years after Cleveland, Ohio.

Ad dollars and humans have one thing in common. Both generally follow the path of least resistance. It makes sense that if relevant messages are presented to people in the context of their current location or click stream they will act within that context of that experience. Advertisers are gaining the ability to make more direct calls. As Richard Harris, CEO of Intent Media recently expressed to me:

“Intent exists anywhere and everywhere that a person chooses to express it. Initially much of that intent was beyond reach. It was too diffused. It was too fleeting. But we’ve now advanced to the point that it’s possible aggregate and render actionable intent well beyond the confines of the search box.”

Some of you may be saying how is this different than AdSense? The key differentiation is that these new technologies are sitting first party and working with that data and doing complex realtime and domain level decisioning that is not possible in AdSense. AdSense is words. This is an understanding of the visitor in context of the events driving their session and algorithms based off data specific to that domain and those events. So this is not only words – this is action. Actions speak louder. With direct dialing intent will become even more loud, clear and connected.

Follow Jonathan Mendez (@jonathanmendez), Yieldbot (@yieldbot) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.