Home Data-Driven Thinking Forget Branding Vs. Performance – Both Are Critical, And Attention Metrics Bridge The Gap

Forget Branding Vs. Performance – Both Are Critical, And Attention Metrics Bridge The Gap

SHARE:

Quick: What’s the most basic purpose of advertising? Is it to generate specific outcomes? Or is it to create the awareness and affinity that lead to lifetime value and loyalty? 

The answer is “all of the above.” Still, despite years of talk about “holistic” marketing, too often, advertising professionals view branding and performance efforts as separate goals. True, branding and performance aren’t necessarily equal sides of the same coin. But they must be viewed as self-reinforcing for either goal to be met.

Consider an advertising campaign from beginning to end. The purpose of advertising is to capture consumers’ attention. From there, advertising is meant to convert awareness and affinity into loyalty and purchases. The best advertising entertains and, most importantly, respects consumers’ time, attention and privacy.

Attention metrics can end the false dichotomy between “performance vs. branding.” These metrics do both at once by ensuring that ad campaigns satisfy performance and branding goals seamlessly in ways that are mutually reinforcing.

Finally, a holistic metric 

Traditional advertising metrics often force marketers into choosing between driving immediate sales (performance) and building brand equity (branding). This false choice stems from the belief that these two objectives require fundamentally different approaches and are evaluated against different criteria. 

But the growing value of attention metrics could finally settle what reasonable arguments couldn’t. Attention is a clearly powerful gauge of interest. That interest could be in the ad itself. Attention metrics can rate the entertainment factor. As media buyers and marketers dive deeper, they can determine if the timeliness of a product or service provides value. Lastly, attention also shows if the branding itself resonates. 

Attention metrics present a truly holistic view of ad effectiveness by measuring how engaged consumers are with an ad, rather than just counting views or clicks. It stands to reason that an attentive consumer is more likely to absorb and react to branding messages. That makes them more likely to convert into a paying customer either immediately or in the future. Measured over time, it’s also an indication of lasting customer loyalty.

A video ad that keeps viewers watching to the end is more likely to create an impression that stays with the consumer, enhancing both brand recall and purchase intent.

Aligning brand messaging with consumer purpose

Polarization in the marketplace isn’t going anywhere. It’s entirely tempting for an advertiser to say, “Can’t we just go back to talking about things consumers want to buy?”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Consumers, especially younger ones, are looking for more than just products or services; they seek brands that align with their values and purposes. This shift in consumer behavior emphasizes the need for brands to build a narrative that resonates deeply with their target audience’s aspirations and values.

Attention metrics can help navigate the sometimes fragile, sometimes rocky terrain of consumer sentiment. This kind of measurement (engagement and interaction) could help brands avoid unnecessary controversy. Attention by itself has a neutral quality. It could be good or bad. Think of attention metrics as an early warning system for messaging that could be initially off-putting and eventually swirls into a consumer backlash.

Advertisers are demanding that advertising truly deliver outcomes. Attention and interaction are the powerful top-of-funnel metrics that deliver the greatest indication that consideration and purchase are (or are not) in motion.

Promoting brand and performance objectives

The ultimate test of attention metrics’ effectiveness is their ability to drive both brand and performance objectives. This involves not only capturing attention but also directing it toward actions that matter: signing up for a newsletter, downloading a brochure or making a purchase.

Strategically, attention metrics allow advertisers to design campaigns that integrate branding elements with strong calls to action (CTAs), ensuring that engagement leads directly to conversions. By understanding how different audiences engage with different types of content, brands can create personalized ads that perform better in both branding and performance metrics.

For example, a high engagement score on an explainer video about a new tech product can be used to introduce a direct CTA at the end of the video, encouraging immediate sign-ups or pre-orders. Simultaneously, the detailed product information enhances brand credibility and authority, contributing to long-term brand-building.

As the digital ecosystem continues to evolve, the adoption of attention metrics will be crucial for marketers aiming to navigate the complexities of consumer engagement successfully. The future of advertising lies in a balanced approach that values consumer attention as the cornerstone of both immediate and sustained marketing success.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow Infillion and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Laurel Rossi, click here.

Must Read

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.