Home Data-Driven Thinking Four Ways Viewable Impressions Will Change The Industry

Four Ways Viewable Impressions Will Change The Industry

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking“Data-Driven Thinking” is a column written by members of the media community and containing fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Mark Hughes, CEO of C3 Metrics.

Economic changes usually begin with whispers. You meet a client for coffee, and he tells you Q2 doesn’t look so good. Or you go to an industry event and there’s a certain confidence in the way people talk, and plan. I’m hearing whispers about a complete change in the economics of digital advertising right now. They’re about viewable impressions, and those whispers are about to elevate the volume by decibels.

The controversy swirling around viewable impressions will change everything we know about the way advertising is measured and priced. Everything. This will be OK in the long run. For the short-term, the definition of viewable impressions, and the unwillingness of advertisers to pay for ads not viewed, is a game-changer of the highest magnitude.

A little background first. The data found in my company’s most recent report indicates that click-through rates on banner ads may be 179% higher than reported for marketers who are not taking viewable impression data into account. The report found that 68% of all display ads served are never ultimately seen by consumers according to the current IAB viewable impression standard.  Of the ads that are not seen, 12% never fully load.

Now, one of the whispers is that the definition of a viewable impression will change – it’s true, and it’s coming soon. The IAB, ANA, and 4A’s will redefine a display impression to be a display ad that fully loads in the consumer’s browser, and comes in view of the consumer’s screen for at least one second. This new industry standard will change the definition from a simple, outdated server request, which misses if the ad even loads let alone is seen. This will ultimately bring more ad dollars into the digital channel. It will change the way those ads are measured.

For the advertising ecosystem to thrive and grow, advertisers need to get value, and publishers, networks, and DSPs need to get value, too.  But when such an imbalance exists (a case when technology moved faster than measurement)–the ad ecosystem gets clogged.  Right now, it’s clogged.

Whispers. When talking privately to publishers, I hear whispers of the pendulum swinging too far, and fear of economic impact (revenue drop). Advertisers will want new pricing models based on research around viewable impressions.

The vision I foresee has no fear at all.  After all is said and done, the Keynesian dynamic of supply and demand is the great equalizer. Going forward, four things will happen:

1. CPMs for non-viewable impressions will drop to zero.  This essentially follows the same idea that if a TV ad never aired, the advertiser doesn’t pay.  It will immediately improve ROI for advertisers by approximately 68%.

2.  CPMs will rise for viewable impressions by at least 68%.  Likely a bit more, since there’s obviously transmission costs for ads not viewable but served.  With the offset, no revenue will be lost by publishers.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

3. iframe delivery of ads will dissipate and eliminate fraud possibility with nested iframes and iframes in general.

4. After advertisers only pay for viewable impressions, effectiveness of display will increase even more than the percentage of ads previously unviewable.  For when DSPs and RTB algorithms optimize with viewable ads versus view-through cookies, which ignore the most important four letter word (view)…the ecosystem produces more ROI.  And ad dollars producing more ROI, beget larger budgets.

The whispers as I said, will become audible, and by the time conference season rolls around in the fall, it will be a roar. These are the four cornerstones of viewable impressions. No need to whisper about them. Let’s get the whispers into the conversation and fix this issue.

Follow C3 Metrics (@C3metrics) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.