Home Data-Driven Thinking How Change Blindness Diminishes Advertising Effectiveness

How Change Blindness Diminishes Advertising Effectiveness

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Serge Ioffe, co-founder and chief technology officer at RevJet.

In a study conducted several years ago, while counting the number of times several jugglers  passed a ball back and forth, test subjects failed to notice a person in a gorilla suit walking by – even when the person stopped to wave at them.

Christopher Chabris, an American research psychologist who conducted the study, found that the world we humans think we see is largely a figment of our imaginations – scenes invented by our brains, based on expectations. Our subconscious attention directs our eyes to focus on parts of a scene deemed important, while our brains fill in the rest. It’s a phenomenon known as “change blindness.”

When a person is paying focused attention to one thing, they will often completely fail to notice something else in the background or periphery. This explains how test subjects failed to notice a person in a gorilla suit passing by, even in the same room. A surprisingly large proportion didn’t notice because they were focused on the jugglers.

So, what’s this got to do with advertising? Everything.

Imagine you’re a marketer at a Fortune 500 retailer running high-performance remarketing campaigns to promote previously viewed products alongside AI-powered product recommendations. And what if, during the back-to-school season, the corporate marketing team requests adding a five-second back-to-school-themed animation to the beginning of every creative. Seems like an OK idea, right? Not so fast.

In real-world experiments, I’ve seen creative with a generic corporate animation tacked onto the beginning perform 25-35% worse than creative that presented products right away. Due to change blindness, a remarketing creative that presents interesting products catches the eye of the consumer much better than the generic holiday animation. Introducing non-product animation as the first “scene” of an animated retargeting creative can delay the average interaction by as much as 10 seconds.

Change blindness profoundly affects how people perceive ads, and by understanding this phenomenon, marketers can make their work more effective. One relating factor includes how truly original an advertisement might be, based on what consumers have already seen. If it looks even roughly familiar to other ads, the odds of their brains paying close attention shrink.

Highly differentiated concepts offer significantly better opportunities to drive big performance improvements. To wit, small “tweaks” to a creative in the form of a slightly modified headline or lightly adjusted animation timing may give performance a bump, but highly differentiated creative can yield performance improvements greater than 50%, in my experience.

What does all of this mean? With an understanding of Chabris’ research, marketers can devise systematic methods to overcome change blindness, such as adopting a scientific approach to hypothesizing, deploying, measuring and acting upon creative treatments that grab a person’s attention. With this knowledge in hand, visual creativity becomes the marketer’s secret weapon in crafting highly effective marketing creatives that truly resonate with customers and drive business objectives.

Follow RevJet (@gorevjet) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: No One To Play With

Google Pulls The Plug On Topics, PAAPI And Other Major Privacy Sandbox APIs (As The CMA Says ‘Cheerio’)

Google’s aborted cookie crackdown ends with a quiet CMA sign-off and a sweeping phaseout of Privacy Sandbox technologies, from the Topics API to PAAPI.

The Trade Desk’s Auction Evolutions Bring High Drama To The Prebid Summit

TTD shared new details about OpenAds features that let publishers see for themselves whether it’s running a fair auction. But tension between TTD and Prebid hung over the event.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

How Google Stands In The DOJ’s Ad Tech Antitrust Suit, According To Those Who Tracked The Trial

The remedies phase of the Google antitrust trial concluded last week. And after 11 days in the courtroom, there is a clearer sense of where Judge Leonie Brinkema is focused on, and how that might influence what remedies she put in place.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Ad Context Protocol Aims To Make Sense Of Agentic Ad Demand

The AI advertising agents will need their own trade group eventually. For now though, a bunch of companies are forming the Ad Context Protocol, or AdCP.

OUTFRONT Is Using Agencies’ AI Enthusiasm To Spur Wider Programmatic OOH Adoption

The desire for a data-driven reinvention of OOH inspired OUTFRONT to create agentic AI tools for executing and measuring OOH campaigns and comparing OOH to other channels.

Inside PubDesk, The Trade Desk’s New Dashboard That Shows What Buyers Actually Care About

A peek inside PubDesk, The Trade Desk’s new dashboard that gives sellers detailed info on how buyers value their inventory.