Home Data-Driven Thinking Key To Better In-Store Experiences: Functional, Rational And Emotional Mobile Apps

Key To Better In-Store Experiences: Functional, Rational And Emotional Mobile Apps

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Kim Harris Busdieker, director of customer communications at 84.51°.

Sometimes we need to say we got it wrong and we’ll do better. That time has come for the retail industry’s in-store digital experiences. The clunky apps and websites offered today pale in comparison to what customers really want.

Retailers have quickly developed apps for isolated customer or retailer needs, but they don’t often function in an integrated way. If we think like customers instead of retailers, we can design digital experiences that enhance in-store experiences while also meeting customer needs in totality.

Digital experiences that are functional, rational and emotional are more likely to lead to repeat visits versus uninstallation.

Functional

So that we don’t create stores full of tech zombies bouncing off each other as they stare at their phones, minimal touch points and “face-down” time are crucial. Apps must be intuitive and reduce the number of steps a customer must take to accomplish a goal.

We can increase the impact on the experience by emphasizing specific functions used by customers most often and making them easily accessible, as touchless as possible and connected across pre-populated customer information. Customers don’t want to input extra data in a critical moment, such as when they are making a mobile payment or when an offer is loading.

Aligning the experience as closely as possible with the actual habits of customers goes a long way toward adding value and freeing attention for navigating and exploring the aisles.

Rational

One set of customers may want to know about what’s on sale right now because they are on a budget and need to maximize their spending for the week. Others may be searching for good deals because they love the thrill of the bargain hunt. These customer needs require different treatment and journeys through a digital experience.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Retailers should communicate with their customers often, try to understand their mindsets and needs during their shopping trips and design journeys that shoppers can choose to take each time they walk into a store.

Emotional

The surest way to customers’ hearts is to solve a problem or meet a need. But their needs are diverse from customer to customer and even trip to trip for the same customer.

Typically, basic need states can be classified as the need to save time, be inspired, save money or find something. Once retailers have identified the set of basic needs customers are fulfilling, they must give them the option to choose which of those needs they want to solve right now.

This could start at home (I want inspiration for dinner tonight), at work (I want to grab a few necessities quickly), in the store (I want to shop my list in the least amount of time) or while wasting time (I want to find cool things cheap), but it always starts with a need versus a function.

Customers don’t want to take multiple steps separately to meet a single need. If retailers can connect those dots for them and make tools easy to use, we have essentially made an emotional connection by making their life easier. Customers should be able to choose different journeys for digital experiences (remember the “Choose Your Own Adventure” books?), and retailers can guide them along the way from there. Understanding them is the first step, and helping them is the next.

This may all sound a little fluffy in a retail world where margins can be razor-thin and monetization of the experience is crucial to support development costs. But if you design the experiences people want to use, the financial ecosystem will be there to support it, not to mention the emotional equity retailers will gain for showing customers they want to help make their lives a little easier.

Follow 84.51° (@8451group) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The Trade Desk Maintains Its High Growth Rate And Touts New Channels

“It’s hard not to be bullish about CTV when it’s both our largest channel and our fastest growing,” said The Trade Desk Founder and CEO Green during the company’s earnings report on Thursday.

After The Election, News Corp Has Harsh Words For Advertisers Who Avoided News

News Corp’s chief exec blasted “the blatant biases of ad agencies and ad associations,” which are “boycotting certain media properties” due to “personal political prejudices.”

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.