Home Data-Driven Thinking With Latest Safari Release, Apple Fixes Its Cookie Glitch

With Latest Safari Release, Apple Fixes Its Cookie Glitch

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Chris Kane, founder at Jounce Media.

For years, Apple’s Safari browser has endeavored to prevent advertising technology companies from tracking user web browsing behavior via cookies. And for years, ad tech companies have tried to circumvent Safari’s cookie policies.

Back in 2012, The Wall Street Journal wrote an exposé on the techniques used by Google and others to exploit loopholes in Safari’s cookie policies. Five years later, Apple is still trying to close these loopholes.

Safari draws an important distinction between first-party and third-party cookies. A cookie is assigned first-party status if it is set by the website that a user is currently visiting. AdExchanger.com, for example, can set a first-party cookie while you’re reading this article. But content loaded from other domains, like an ad served by doubleclick.net, is given third-party status, and Safari prevents these domains from setting cookies.

The most common technique for circumventing these rules relies on click tracking to create opportunities for setting persistent cookies. Here’s how it works:

When users click on ads, they navigate to the advertiser’s landing page. But in most cases, the user’s browser actually redirects through one or more click-tracking URLs. In the fleeting moment when a browser is connected directly to a click-tracking URL, Safari gives that ad tech domain first-party status, creating the opportunity for the ad tech company to set a persistent cookie. And once that persistent cookie is set, the ad tech company can continue to read for its presence, even when connecting to the browser as a third party.

While desktop Safari has negligible market share, more than 50% of mobile web browsing happens on Safari browsers. All browsing activity on iOS, even on standalone web browsers like the Chrome app, is powered by Safari’s WebKit and governed by Apple’s third-party cookie policies. Users can change these default cookie settings, but no one does, and so targeting and measurement is more or less broken for the majority of mobile web traffic. While Safari’s cookie policies are an afterthought for desktop advertising, they are the backbone of mobile web advertising, making the first-party cookie loophole essential for many buy-side and sell-side ad tech platforms.

At June’s developer conference, Apple announced that is is closing the loophole. It is fixing the glitch. Powered by a combination of more stringent cookie expiration policies and intelligent cookie clearing, Safari will begin purging ad tech cookies that were set via the first-party loophole. The first release of this new cookie policy will apply only to desktop Safari, but the writing is on the wall for mobile web cookie tracking.

Here’s what this means for ad land:

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

  • Mobile web monetization is going to get even worse for publishers. The absence of audience data on Safari means that advertisers can’t target ads or measure their effectiveness. That depresses demand for both direct-sold and programmatic channels, pulling down publisher yield.
  • The consumer experience on the mobile web is also going to get even worse. Apple’s new policy is meant to protect consumer privacy, but it accomplishes this at the expense of ad relevance. Publishers will increase ad load to offset CPM erosion, and consumers will be exposed to a higher volume of untargeted ads.
  • Amazon and Facebook win again. Their consumer products give them a massive footprint of first-party cookies, creating an insurmountable advantage in targeting and measuring mobile web ads. (Google might have been a winner here too, but its decision to operate ad tech products on the DoubleClick domain demotes it to the same third-party status as any other ad tech platform.)

This also means that the ad tech world is going back to the drawing board on managing mobile web user identity. The industry made a collective misstep by building on top of a loophole. When a powerful company like Apple controls foundational advertising technology, the rest of the industry is subject to unpredictable shifts. The web turns out to be less open than we’ve been led to believe, and a handful of powerful companies now set the rules for how the rest of the industry operates.

Follow Jounce Media (@jouncemedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.

Freestar Is Taking The ‘Baby Carrot’ Approach To Curation

Freestar adopted a new approach to curation developed by Audigent that gives buyers a priority lane to publisher inventory with higher viewability and attention scores than most open-auction inventory.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Header Bidding Rapper (Wrapper!)

IAB Tech Lab Made Moves To Acquire Prebid In 2021 – And Prebid Said No

The story of how Prebid.org came to be – and almost didn’t – is an important one for the industry.

Discover Wiped Out MFA Spend By Following These Four Basic Steps

By implementing the anti-MFA playbook detailed in the ANA’s November report, brands were able to reduce the portion of their programmatic budgets going to made-for-advertising sites to about 1%.

Welcome to the Cookie Complaint Department

PAAPI Could Be As Effective For Retargeting As Third-Parties Cookies, Study Finds

There’s been plenty of mudslinging in and around the Chrome Privacy Sandbox. But the Protected Audiences API (PAAPI) maybe ain’t so bad, according to researchers at Boston University.