Home Data-Driven Thinking Like A Chicken Talking To A Duck: To Understand And Act On Big Data, You First Need To Unify It

Like A Chicken Talking To A Duck: To Understand And Act On Big Data, You First Need To Unify It

SHARE:

sidshah“Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Sid Shah, Director of Business Analytics for Advertising Solutions at Adobe.

As a technical, data-savvy CMO, you want to make all key strategic decisions based on data and predictive analytics. To ensure this is possible, you’ve invested heavily in multiple solutions for measuring and optimizing marketing campaigns across all channels: you have a display-tracking solution, a search solution, a cross-channel measurement tag and a site-analytics platform, and you’ve even invested in an enterprise data cube to bring all your offline data together. But when you ask strategic questions  –  even basic ones  – you still can’t get good answers.

Consider this simple example. A CMO wants to understand if his or her display campaigns are effective. The answer is often murky because display campaigns usually involve multiple vendors, each with its own unique tracking system. Adding further complexity, the search and display campaigns use different tracking systems. As a result, it’s impossible to build a cookie-level purchase path within display and across channels. Each tracking system doesn’t speak the language of the other. It is, as they say in Cantonese, like “a chicken talking to a duck.

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Meanwhile, CMOs face growing pressure to answer the media mix and attribution questions: What is the impact each channel has on my overall marketing performance? And how do I allocate budgets across channels, brands and geos to maximize all my business goals?

But when the basic tracking and data warehouses aren’t in place, it’s impossible to answer these questions. And if the data quality is poor, then all analysis based on that data is likely to be plain wrong.

It doesn’t have to be this way. It’s possible to get good data and to build a marketing-analytics engine that can effectively convert that data into the same language so decisions can be made based on all the available information.

What A Powerful Marketing-Analytics Engine Looks Like

The schematic below shows the basic building blocks of a good marketing-analytics engine. The foundation of the engine is the data-collection layer, in which data is collected from various marketing efforts as well as consumer responses at different points in the sales life cycle.

On the digital side, a unified cookie to capture the consumer journey within a channel – such as display – as well as across channels is essential. It’s also important to capture offline data to get the full picture; large multichannel retailers, especially, need to get offline store data to understand the impact that marketing has on their overall business. Finally, this first-party data should be augmented with data from third-party sources such as Nielsen to help put everything in context. And all this data needs to be captured and stored in a data warehouse.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

storyimage

On top of that, the analytics engine itself is made up of two key components: a cookie-transformation component that takes the cookie-level data and stiches it into the consumer journey, and an econometrics engine that marries offline data to the cookie-level information using pieces of information like time stamps. Econometrics becomes vital for measurement when there’s no direct way to assess the effect of an ad on a user, which is the case for offline marketing.

Once those data collection and analytics layers have been properly set up, the complex marketing questions can finally be answered. For instance:

  • The cookie-level data can be combined with the econometrics to provide media mix forecasts.
  • The cookie-level data itself can be used to understand the view-through attribution for display.
  • The purchase path can be analyzed to understand the effect of advertising on customer lifetime value.

The possibilities are endless once the building blocks are in place. Other benefits of consolidating marketing data include:

1.       Data as a common currency

One of the biggest advantages of a unified data warehouse or “data cube” is that it makes data the common and interchangeable language among different divisions and departments. This can help marketing address finance’s questions about whether the marketing team’s efforts are directly tied to conversions, for instance. With common cookie-level data and good algorithmic attribution, a unified data warehouse also eliminates the problem of “attribution wars” that often politicize marketing departments, in which each channel claims success over the others based on whichever attribution rule best suits them.

2.       Closing the strategy execution gap

Another key problem marketers face is one of timing: Strategies are usually developed at the beginning of a fiscal year and executed later. And it might take weeks or months to assess whether a campaign was successful or not. However, by unifying the data onto one platform, you can understand the effects of a campaign quickly – and even correct its course mid-campaign by altering creative and adjusting budgets.

Big data presents a big opportunity for marketers but also a huge challenge. To become a truly data-driven marketing organization that can fully realize its revenue opportunities, it’s imperative to have consolidated, unified and standardized data on which to base your decisions. Otherwise, you’ll just be a chicken talking to a duck.

Follow Sid Shah (@drsidshah) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.

Freestar Is Taking The ‘Baby Carrot’ Approach To Curation

Freestar adopted a new approach to curation developed by Audigent that gives buyers a priority lane to publisher inventory with higher viewability and attention scores than most open-auction inventory.