Home Data-Driven Thinking Our Marketing Measurement Journey Is Going Nowhere

Our Marketing Measurement Journey Is Going Nowhere

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Julie Van Ullen, General Manager, US Growth, at Rakuten Marketing

It’s hard to find something new to say about digital marketing measurement. Today’s headlines about measurement seem no different in tone from those published five plus years ago.

For example, this Forbes article from 2013 notes the disconnect between what marketers think is the right way to measure online marketing and what they actually do (last-click attribution). Several years later, it’s hard to know what has changed.

We’re still having the same conversations. We’ve been envisioning this road trip for years, but the car is still in the garage. We know the destination – and have countless technologies claiming to help get us there.

What is holding us back from just sticking the key in the transmission and pushing the gas?

There is a notable disconnect between the way we measure online marketing and the actual business objectives that drive a company’s bottom line. And fixing that is not as simple as adapting the right analytics or attribution technology, despite popular assertions.

No, we need to take a serious look at the engine that powers the car before we can move forward. Right now, it’s dangerously segmented. There are parts that run the steering and others that make the wheels turn, but the car is going nowhere until those pieces learn to talk to each other.

It’s been said time and again, but it’s a serious problem that marketing is broken into channels. These channels do not talk to each other, and they’re competing to get credit for each sale. And as long as marketing budgets are broken down by channel, marketing measurement will never change. Those channel managers will always be on the hook to prove their channel is worth the investment, and they’ll always compete for a greater share of budget.

There’s no doubt that last-click attribution is an efficient way to see which channels drive the most sales – and it’s here to stay, as long as we’re measuring channel performance.

That’s why, years later, we’re still stuck in the garage.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

So, what’s the solution?

Well, there are two ways marketers make money: acquiring new customers and repeat purchases from existing customers. I’m not suggesting that marketers simply start measuring performance based on these goals, but I am suggesting that they invest their marketing dollars based on these goals.

This will require that channels work together to deliver results. In an ideal world, a marketer should be able to request a percent lift in new shoppers and a set return-on-ad-spend goal for their budget. Then the budget should be optimized to deliver that performance, across the channels and strategies that will deliver their goals.

This is the first critical step in getting that marketing engine running. Not only does it enable marketing channels to speak to each other, but it has them working toward clear and common goals. Once the engine is working, attribution and analytics tools become much more valuable. When marketers know how their investments are working, they will have greater insight into where to invest more to increase their returns and make those marketing dollars work harder.

The challenge is that this is a big step to make. It’s not just a minor tweak, it’s a total overhaul of the engine we’ve been relying on for years. But the market is moving in the right direction to make this a reality.

The question is, who will be the first to put rubber to the road?

Follow Rakuten Marketing (@RakutenMKTG) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.