Home Data-Driven Thinking Our Marketing Measurement Journey Is Going Nowhere

Our Marketing Measurement Journey Is Going Nowhere

SHARE:

“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Julie Van Ullen, General Manager, US Growth, at Rakuten Marketing

It’s hard to find something new to say about digital marketing measurement. Today’s headlines about measurement seem no different in tone from those published five plus years ago.

For example, this Forbes article from 2013 notes the disconnect between what marketers think is the right way to measure online marketing and what they actually do (last-click attribution). Several years later, it’s hard to know what has changed.

We’re still having the same conversations. We’ve been envisioning this road trip for years, but the car is still in the garage. We know the destination – and have countless technologies claiming to help get us there.

What is holding us back from just sticking the key in the transmission and pushing the gas?

There is a notable disconnect between the way we measure online marketing and the actual business objectives that drive a company’s bottom line. And fixing that is not as simple as adapting the right analytics or attribution technology, despite popular assertions.

No, we need to take a serious look at the engine that powers the car before we can move forward. Right now, it’s dangerously segmented. There are parts that run the steering and others that make the wheels turn, but the car is going nowhere until those pieces learn to talk to each other.

It’s been said time and again, but it’s a serious problem that marketing is broken into channels. These channels do not talk to each other, and they’re competing to get credit for each sale. And as long as marketing budgets are broken down by channel, marketing measurement will never change. Those channel managers will always be on the hook to prove their channel is worth the investment, and they’ll always compete for a greater share of budget.

There’s no doubt that last-click attribution is an efficient way to see which channels drive the most sales – and it’s here to stay, as long as we’re measuring channel performance.

That’s why, years later, we’re still stuck in the garage.

So, what’s the solution?

Well, there are two ways marketers make money: acquiring new customers and repeat purchases from existing customers. I’m not suggesting that marketers simply start measuring performance based on these goals, but I am suggesting that they invest their marketing dollars based on these goals.

This will require that channels work together to deliver results. In an ideal world, a marketer should be able to request a percent lift in new shoppers and a set return-on-ad-spend goal for their budget. Then the budget should be optimized to deliver that performance, across the channels and strategies that will deliver their goals.

This is the first critical step in getting that marketing engine running. Not only does it enable marketing channels to speak to each other, but it has them working toward clear and common goals. Once the engine is working, attribution and analytics tools become much more valuable. When marketers know how their investments are working, they will have greater insight into where to invest more to increase their returns and make those marketing dollars work harder.

The challenge is that this is a big step to make. It’s not just a minor tweak, it’s a total overhaul of the engine we’ve been relying on for years. But the market is moving in the right direction to make this a reality.

The question is, who will be the first to put rubber to the road?

Follow Rakuten Marketing (@RakutenMKTG) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?