Home Data-Driven Thinking Privacy Sandbox Scrutiny Needs To Dig Deeper To Find Its Real Flaws

Privacy Sandbox Scrutiny Needs To Dig Deeper To Find Its Real Flaws

SHARE:
Mathieu Roche, co-founder and CEO at ID5

The advertising industry is turning to Google to save it from the chaos of cookie deprecation that Google itself created.

All eyes are on the Privacy Sandbox. Much has been said about the advertising use cases it enables, but hardly anything on what it restricts.

However, the devil is in the details. Out of the 15 features bundled in the Privacy Sandbox, 12 are restrictive by nature and have the potential to stifle ad tech innovation and disrupt many advertising use cases.

Privacy-conscious or anti-competitive?

Let’s take a closer look at two of these features: Fenced Frames and IP Protection.

The Fenced Frames initiative partitions access to data to disable cross-site data sharing. The use of the HTML element <fencedframe> restricts the flow of information and creates a silo that is only accessible through the Privacy Sandbox.

To gain access, all website owners and third parties would need to use Privacy Sandbox and enter through the fenced frame. Topics, Protected Audience and Attribution Reporting are then used to extract aggregated information from inside this silo, sharing what happens inside the “Privacy Black Box.”

In other words, Google decides what information is shared, undermining brands’ ability to access data they need to support crucial use cases such as measurement and attribution outside of the Sandbox fence. It’s another example of how cookie deprecation has become an opportunity for Google to tilt the playing field in its favor while hiding behind the guise of privacy conscientiousness.

Google’s IP Protection is another proposal that deserves more attention. Designed to enhance privacy and control by minimizing the risk of unauthorized identification and data leakage for publishers, IP Protection resembles Apple’s Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP) in Safari.

Although IP Protection is expected to have a limited impact on addressability solutions that rely on consent or first-party integrations with publishers, it might have a disruptive impact on media owners and advertisers.

IP addresses play a crucial role in fraud detection and geo-targeting use cases. Many companies choose not to run advertisements in certain jurisdictions for regulatory reasons. Blocking IP address sharing by default could make these use cases obsolete.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Hope on the horizon

Amid all of this, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority has emerged as an unlikely hero. The CMA’s goal is to maintain a competitive environment, specifically ensuring the Privacy Sandbox doesn’t give Google an advantage.

Although the CMA has been evaluating all features within the Privacy Sandbox, the focus has been placed on the effectiveness of the Protected Audience and Topics APIs Google released to support some advertising use cases like audience targeting and retargeting.

But, to ensure fair competition, the CMA must also scrutinize smaller features bundled in the broader Sandbox road map and the impact these features might have.

Unraveling Google’s web

There is another important aspect of the Privacy Sandbox that has been overlooked. Google has linked the Privacy Sandbox with cookie deprecation. This means that if the Privacy Sandbox fails to deliver, Google can hide behind the CMA to postpone its timeline once again and keep the industry in a state of flux.

On the other hand, if Google’s framework works well, marketers and publishers will rely even more on the tech giant for their advertising activities.

Either way, Google comes out ahead.

Fostering competition in the post-cookie world requires disconnecting Privacy Sandbox from cookie deprecation, scrutinizing it meticulously and treating it for what it is: one of the many frameworks supporting addressable and measurable advertising.

This way, we can release some of the pressure applied by Google’s iron fist and build a competitive and innovative ecosystem for marketers and publishers.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow ID5 and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Mathieu Roche, click here.

Must Read

What Publishers Need To Know About Floor Pricing

At Tuesday’s Prebid Summit, a panel of publisher and pub tech execs shared tips for how publishers can get the most out their flooring strategies.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Why Mondelez Piloted A Shopper Marketing Test Between Albertsons And Fetch

“I always said, I think we need to change our title, because it’s not the old school shopper marketing,” said Anne Martin, director of shopper marketing for Mondelez International, which owns Oreo, Ritz, and a variety of other snacks.

Forget The FUD, Now DoubleVerify Wants Advertisers To Get Back Into The News

Even brand safety companies think news blocking has gone too far. DV is exploring ways to help advertisers support legitimate news and just hired its first-ever head of news.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

To Reduce The Ad Tech Tax, Sovrn Expands Its SaaS Pricing Model

Sovrn is now offering its header bidding managed service, dubbed Ad Management, as self-serve software for a flat CPM fee.

play button with many coins isolated on blue background. The concept of monetization of the video. Making money on video content. minimal style. 3d rendering

Exclusive: Connatix And JW Player Merge To Create A One-Stop Shop For Video Monetization

On Wednesday, video monetization platforms Connatix and JW Player announced plans to merge into a new entity called JWP Connatix. The deal was first rumored in July.

Buyers Can Now Target High-Attention Inventory In The Trade Desk

By applying Adelaide’s Attention Unit scoring, buyers can target low-, medium- and high-attention inventory via TTD’s self-serve platform.