Home Data-Driven Thinking Read This Before You Spend Money On Mobile

Read This Before You Spend Money On Mobile

SHARE:

tuleya-usethis“Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Chris Tuleya, Vice President of eDR at Underscore Marketing.

Smartphone ownership has skyrocketed in the last three years, with nearly half of the US population now using smartphones. The trend has left brands scrambling to “do something” in the mobile space.

All the scrambling, though, can lead brands astray if they spend money on mobile initiatives before they understand all the implications of becoming more active in the mobile space.

I’m not saying that brands shouldn’t launch mobile sites. Building a mobile site can be a good investment even if you decide never to drive traffic to it. If your brand needs to provide basic information to your customer regardless of which device they are using, for example, a mobile-optimized site is a necessity. Not surprisingly, a recent Google study found that consumers visiting a non-mobile site with a mobile device feel frustrated and annoyed.

But this doesn’t mean that brands ought to actively invest money in driving traffic to their mobile sites. Developing a mobile-optimized site for a friendly customer experience is drastically different from aggressively pursuing a mobile audience. A critical question to consider is: How will mobile drive your brand forward?

Aggressively utilizing media as a mobile driver first requires a better understanding of the role mobile plays within an advertiser’s marketing mix. Here are three key areas for brands to consider when sizing up the mobile opportunity:

  1. Customer Intent and Needs:  Do your mobile-site visitors look for bits of information, or do you want them to take some sort of action? Is the desired action realistic for someone on a mobile device? For instance, your mobile site might not be the place to ask users to fill out multipage forms. To understand your customers’ intents and needs, it can help to analyze your search trends.
  2. Mobile Influence:  It’s important to understand what influence mobile will have on your customers. If you are a low-consideration brand, a mobile property may not increase the likelihood of directly impacting action. If this is the case, actively seeking a mobile audience may not yield much benefit. However, if you can directly persuade consumers to take an immediate action – whether it’s ordering online or driving to a brick-and-mortar – some level of mobile targeting is essential.
  3. Audience Size: Meeting your mobile device audience at the right time with the right message can be a daunting task. Given the limited screen real estate, both in the ad and overall, getting in front of the right audience is crucial for mobile ads to be effective. Unfortunately, the type of targeting tactics used to create these serendipitous moments often limit reach. When looking to justify a mobile investment, you can be tempted to expand outside of your target to capture volume, but – like all marketing efforts – the focus should be on quality, not just quantity.

With mobile use gaining critical mass, marketers are at risk of flocking toward the shiny new objective without first clarifying its role. I believe mobile has great potential, giving consumers constant access to the world’s information from their pocket or purse. But it’s imperative to market to consumers at the right time and place to make it an effective channel for driving your brand.

To avoid frustrating and annoying your customers, you need to solve the mystery of mobile’s role for your brand before you invest in a mobile plan.

Follow Chris Tuleya (@tuleya) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.

Freestar Is Taking The ‘Baby Carrot’ Approach To Curation

Freestar adopted a new approach to curation developed by Audigent that gives buyers a priority lane to publisher inventory with higher viewability and attention scores than most open-auction inventory.