Home Data-Driven Thinking The Psychology Of App Usage: Targeting Motivations, Not Models

The Psychology Of App Usage: Targeting Motivations, Not Models

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Taylor West, general manager, North America, at Zeotap.

The eyes may be the mirror to the soul, but your smartphone is the mirror to everything else about you.

In the US, 88% of mobile time is spent in apps, according to comScore, and engagement is a daily habit — people launch at least nine apps daily.

Given how tethered we are to our mobile devices, there is no better indicator of who we are. From what we install, to the frequency that we turn to them and the actions we take within, these precious insights form a picture of who we are as individuals. From interests, behaviors and even sociodemographics, our phones know us better than our closest friends.

Judging interests and preferences by app use is nothing new – it’s common to assume that people using the Food Network app enjoy cooking, and those invested in the ESPN app like sports. App use can also indicate sociodemographic information.

A potential wealth of insights

In 2016, researchers from Aalto University in Finland and Qatar Computing Research Institute analyzed demographics and app usage to create models to predict gender, age, marital status and income with up to 82% accuracy. For example, the study showed that women are likely to have Pinterest or Etsy on their phones, and if you use LinkedIn and Fitbit, your income is likely $50,000 or higher.

However interesting, these types of modeled insights – while a good starting point – aren’t nearly as impressive as what we could glean about audiences.

The industry has a tremendous opportunity to move beyond just a few data points about larger groups of the population to actually understanding the makeup of users. By looking at particular app usage and the frequency of actions taken, advertisers could be much more strategic in their planning by targeting the psychological makeup at an individual level.

What’s holding back in-app targeting?

The real challenge is making the most of app data for better targeting. Apps are closed, siloed ecosystems that don’t speak to each other, so advertisers don’t always have access to a broad profile across any given user. For example, through SDKs and other means, it’s relatively easy to tell whether Pinterest, LinkedIn and Uber are installed on a user’s phone. What’s much more challenging and out of reach is whether they actually use these apps and how.

What if the user hasn’t opened 40 of their apps this year? What exactly are they doing in the apps they do use? In general, SDKs have limited insights into actual use of apps, based on the permissions granted to them from app creators.

The other issue is that popular premium apps such as Uber are very protective of their data, but it could be a game-changer for advertisers to know users’ travel behaviors. For example, if a brand wants to engage with a younger crowd that frequents clubs or bars, it might target users between 21-34 years of age who have higher propensities to use the Uber app frequently during late evenings or early mornings on Fridays and Saturdays in urban areas.

If we ever want to truly tap into the targeting gold mine of apps, the industry needs to solve the technological challenges of cross-app silos and convince premium apps that their valuable data can be an incredible revenue stream while still remaining privacy-compliant.

Advertisers say they want one-to-one relationships with their audiences and consumers say they want more relevant ads. We simply need more visibility to piece app data together to make substantially more insightful user profiles.

Everyone has data privacy and the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation on their minds – as they should – but we must find the right balance to dramatically improve digital advertising from modeled assumptions to those based on how users actually think and act.

Follow Zeotap (@zeotap) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

AI Is Redefining Premium Content – Which May Not Be A Good Thing

At AdExchanger’s Programmatic AI conference, media experts discussed how the rise of AI-generated content is changing the industry’s understanding of “premium” content.

The Big Story Podcast

Prog AI Live: AI’s Slippery Slop

Recorded live in Las Vegas at Prog AI, the AdExchanger team tackles a tricky question: As AI floods the feed with chaotic, addictive content and people engage with it, what does “premium” even mean anymore?

The Programmatic Auction Is Changing In Real Time – Here’s How

Two decades after the first RTB auction, programmatic is more complex than ever – and that’s before you even consider generative AI.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Publicis Acquires LiveRamp In A Major Shakeup For Indie Data Collaboration

Hundreds of exasperated and unexpected ad industry phone calls were made on Sunday, as agencies and ad tech vendors discussed the fallout of Publicis Groupe’s $2.2 billion acquisition of LiveRamp over the weekend.

Finger connecting dots on a cork board network concept

These AI Agents Want To Handle All The Annoying Parts Of Media Buying

Meet Kovva, a new AI ad tech startup tackling the unglamorous gruntwork that programmatic has never fully automated.

Felipe Cuevas for TelevisaUnivision

We Went To Eight Upfronts This Week. Here's What We Learned

Upfront week is officially over. In case you missed any of the dog-and-pony shows — including Chappell Roan belting out “Pink Pony Club” during YouTube’s Broadcast — don’t worry; we’ve got you covered.