Home Data-Driven Thinking Viewable Impressions And iFrames: Protecting Your Blind Side

Viewable Impressions And iFrames: Protecting Your Blind Side

SHARE:

Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media. Today’s column is written by Mark Hughes, CEO of C3 Metrics.

It was a Michael Lewis book before it was a Sandra Bullock movie. Published in 2006, “The Blind Side” stated very elegantly what most football strategists had already begun to figure out. If your most important player in the game (quarterback) gets injured, you can kiss success goodbye.

Internet strategists have begun to see the same thing and taking steps to protect their most valuable asset. For DSPs and networks, it’s their intelligence, their targeting techniques, their day-parting, and their science. For advertisers, it’s their budgets. But the common denominator that hangs a huge question mark around both is their blind side, an issue the industry is attempting to solve with viewable impression standards. We estimate 68% or more of display ads are never seen by consumers, and initiatives like the cross-industry Making Measurement Make Sense coalition are hoping to eliminate the blind side and create a more efficient marketplace.

The proverbial Internet quarterback is the RTB platform. Despite all the infrastructure and real-time intelligence within RTB, if the blind side of viewable impressions isn’t covered, it knocks the wind out of increasing revenue for everyone using these display inventory platforms.

Despite the strides the IAB, ANA and 4A’s are making around viewable impressions, there is another hidden blind side. It’s this:  approximately 80% of display ads are delivered via iFrame (the remaining 20% are delivered with JavaScript).  Most leaders in viewable impressions have cracked the code on JavaScript.  The data coming from the JavaScript side of viewable impressions is exciting, but it’s less than a quarter of the problem at hand. Solving viewability with iFrames is a lot like breathing under water — humans can’t do it without a special apparatus. In the case of iFrames that apparatus is very hard to build.

The challenge with iFrames, specifically iFrames that come from a different domain delivering ads, is that the viewable impression code within the iFrame is not able to access the publisher page due to the “Same Origin Policy.”

As Mozilla defines it (dating back to the grandfathers of browsers Netscape Navigator 2.0):  “The same origin policy prevents a document or script loaded from one origin from getting or setting properties of a document from another origin.”

Essentially the authors of the same origin policy wanted to prevent the loss of data confidentiality or integrity with strict separation between content provided by unrelated sites.  This permits scripts running on pages originating from the same site to access each other’s methods and properties with no specific restrictions, but prevents access to most methods and properties across pages on different sites.

This is why the blind side of cross-domain iFrames is so difficult, and why it is one of the most common questions asked on Stack Overflow.

Several workarounds to access properties of the publisher page are possible, but all require the participation of the publisher, which presents additional compliance issues.  It’s a difficult problem.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

So viewability must be solved both in the U.S. and E.U. for the full 100% of display ads served. As an industry, we won’t see a win until we seal the blind side, solving viewability in both JavaScript and iFrame.

Follow C3 Metrics (@c3metrics), Mark Hughes (@buzzmark) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Closeup image bag of money and judge gavel. Lawsuit, auction, bribe and penalty concept.

The LG Ads Legal Saga Continues With A Fresh Suit, This Time Against Kroll

Alphonso co-founder Lampros Kalampoukas is suing Kroll for allegedly undervaluing the company by nearly $100 million to aid LG Electronics in a shareholder dispute.

Comic: Metric Meditations

The Startup Trying To Automate The Ad Platform Reconciliation And Refund Mess

The ad tech startup Vaudit, founded last year by Mike Hahn, aims to automate the process of campaign reconciliation atop major ad platforms.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Trade Desk Lays Out Its Case To Beat Walled Gardens. Does Wall Street Buy It?

The Trade Desk continued its shaky 2025 earnings schedule when it reported Q2 results on Thursday.

Magnite Targets CTV, SMBs And Google's SSP Market Share

The SSP is betting on the DOJ’s antitrust remedies, plus closer relationships with agencies, DSPs and mid-sized advertisers, to help it eat some of Google’s lunch.

Zillow Pilots Containerized RTB, As It Rethinks The Equation Of Quality And Cost

Zillow is the pilot brand advertiser to test a new programmatic buying strategy known as containerized RTB. The strategy embeds the DSP or ad-buying platform intelligence, in this case the startup Chalice Custom Algorithms, within the SSP, which is Index Exchange.