Home Data-Driven Thinking Viewable Impressions And iFrames: Protecting Your Blind Side

Viewable Impressions And iFrames: Protecting Your Blind Side

SHARE:

Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media. Today’s column is written by Mark Hughes, CEO of C3 Metrics.

It was a Michael Lewis book before it was a Sandra Bullock movie. Published in 2006, “The Blind Side” stated very elegantly what most football strategists had already begun to figure out. If your most important player in the game (quarterback) gets injured, you can kiss success goodbye.

Internet strategists have begun to see the same thing and taking steps to protect their most valuable asset. For DSPs and networks, it’s their intelligence, their targeting techniques, their day-parting, and their science. For advertisers, it’s their budgets. But the common denominator that hangs a huge question mark around both is their blind side, an issue the industry is attempting to solve with viewable impression standards. We estimate 68% or more of display ads are never seen by consumers, and initiatives like the cross-industry Making Measurement Make Sense coalition are hoping to eliminate the blind side and create a more efficient marketplace.

The proverbial Internet quarterback is the RTB platform. Despite all the infrastructure and real-time intelligence within RTB, if the blind side of viewable impressions isn’t covered, it knocks the wind out of increasing revenue for everyone using these display inventory platforms.

Despite the strides the IAB, ANA and 4A’s are making around viewable impressions, there is another hidden blind side. It’s this:  approximately 80% of display ads are delivered via iFrame (the remaining 20% are delivered with JavaScript).  Most leaders in viewable impressions have cracked the code on JavaScript.  The data coming from the JavaScript side of viewable impressions is exciting, but it’s less than a quarter of the problem at hand. Solving viewability with iFrames is a lot like breathing under water — humans can’t do it without a special apparatus. In the case of iFrames that apparatus is very hard to build.

The challenge with iFrames, specifically iFrames that come from a different domain delivering ads, is that the viewable impression code within the iFrame is not able to access the publisher page due to the “Same Origin Policy.”

As Mozilla defines it (dating back to the grandfathers of browsers Netscape Navigator 2.0):  “The same origin policy prevents a document or script loaded from one origin from getting or setting properties of a document from another origin.”

Essentially the authors of the same origin policy wanted to prevent the loss of data confidentiality or integrity with strict separation between content provided by unrelated sites.  This permits scripts running on pages originating from the same site to access each other’s methods and properties with no specific restrictions, but prevents access to most methods and properties across pages on different sites.

This is why the blind side of cross-domain iFrames is so difficult, and why it is one of the most common questions asked on Stack Overflow.

Several workarounds to access properties of the publisher page are possible, but all require the participation of the publisher, which presents additional compliance issues.  It’s a difficult problem.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

So viewability must be solved both in the U.S. and E.U. for the full 100% of display ads served. As an industry, we won’t see a win until we seal the blind side, solving viewability in both JavaScript and iFrame.

Follow C3 Metrics (@c3metrics), Mark Hughes (@buzzmark) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.