Home Data-Driven Thinking Viewable Impressions And iFrames: Protecting Your Blind Side

Viewable Impressions And iFrames: Protecting Your Blind Side

SHARE:

Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media. Today’s column is written by Mark Hughes, CEO of C3 Metrics.

It was a Michael Lewis book before it was a Sandra Bullock movie. Published in 2006, “The Blind Side” stated very elegantly what most football strategists had already begun to figure out. If your most important player in the game (quarterback) gets injured, you can kiss success goodbye.

Internet strategists have begun to see the same thing and taking steps to protect their most valuable asset. For DSPs and networks, it’s their intelligence, their targeting techniques, their day-parting, and their science. For advertisers, it’s their budgets. But the common denominator that hangs a huge question mark around both is their blind side, an issue the industry is attempting to solve with viewable impression standards. We estimate 68% or more of display ads are never seen by consumers, and initiatives like the cross-industry Making Measurement Make Sense coalition are hoping to eliminate the blind side and create a more efficient marketplace.

The proverbial Internet quarterback is the RTB platform. Despite all the infrastructure and real-time intelligence within RTB, if the blind side of viewable impressions isn’t covered, it knocks the wind out of increasing revenue for everyone using these display inventory platforms.

Despite the strides the IAB, ANA and 4A’s are making around viewable impressions, there is another hidden blind side. It’s this:  approximately 80% of display ads are delivered via iFrame (the remaining 20% are delivered with JavaScript).  Most leaders in viewable impressions have cracked the code on JavaScript.  The data coming from the JavaScript side of viewable impressions is exciting, but it’s less than a quarter of the problem at hand. Solving viewability with iFrames is a lot like breathing under water — humans can’t do it without a special apparatus. In the case of iFrames that apparatus is very hard to build.

The challenge with iFrames, specifically iFrames that come from a different domain delivering ads, is that the viewable impression code within the iFrame is not able to access the publisher page due to the “Same Origin Policy.”

As Mozilla defines it (dating back to the grandfathers of browsers Netscape Navigator 2.0):  “The same origin policy prevents a document or script loaded from one origin from getting or setting properties of a document from another origin.”

Essentially the authors of the same origin policy wanted to prevent the loss of data confidentiality or integrity with strict separation between content provided by unrelated sites.  This permits scripts running on pages originating from the same site to access each other’s methods and properties with no specific restrictions, but prevents access to most methods and properties across pages on different sites.

This is why the blind side of cross-domain iFrames is so difficult, and why it is one of the most common questions asked on Stack Overflow.

Several workarounds to access properties of the publisher page are possible, but all require the participation of the publisher, which presents additional compliance issues.  It’s a difficult problem.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

So viewability must be solved both in the U.S. and E.U. for the full 100% of display ads served. As an industry, we won’t see a win until we seal the blind side, solving viewability in both JavaScript and iFrame.

Follow C3 Metrics (@c3metrics), Mark Hughes (@buzzmark) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: "Deal ID, please."

The Trade Desk And PubMatic Are Done Pretending Deal IDs Work

The Trade Desk and PubMatic announced a new API-based integration for managing deal ID campaigns built atop TTD’s Price Discovery and Provisioning (PDP) API, which was announced earlier this year.

Uber Launches A Platform-Specific Attention Metric With Adelaide And Kantar

Uber Advertising, in partnership with Adelaide and Kantar, launched a first-of-its-type custom attention metric score for its platform advertisers.

Google Shakes Off Its Troubles And Outperforms On Revenue Yet Again

Alphabet reported on Wednesday that its total Q3 revenue was $102.3 billion, up 16% year over year, while net profit increased by a third to $35 billion.