Home Data-Driven Thinking Why Viewable Impressions Won’t Matter

Why Viewable Impressions Won’t Matter

SHARE:

alex-calic-ddt“Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media. 

Today’s column is written by Alex Calic, Chief Revenue Officer at The Media Trust.

Based on the velocity of articles written on the topic last year, “viewable impressions” has displaced “ad verification” as the hot delivery topic in the ad tech industry for 2013. But when you consider how the media consumption habits of Internet users are changing, viewability fades in near-term importance.

Consumers are spending ever more time on social networks — more than any other category of sites on the web — and as such are becoming accustomed to a content experience that differs significantly from what is offered by typical website content management systems. The traditional web page is an adaptation of legacy print media, which pieces together multiple columns of static content with blocks of ads in a portrait layout. Led by Facebook’s News Feed, social networks are popularizing a different approach that displays standardized units of content, in the form of text, links and images from a user’s social graph. Those content elements appear in a single column that updates with new information in real time.

quartz-calic-usethisThe pace of adoption of mobile devices is furthering the spread of this stream-based approach to presenting content, as digital media companies attempt to package all of the information embedded on a traditional web page into a mobile app or website with very limited screen real estate.

An early example of this was the September launch of Atlantic Media’s Quartz (left), a digital-only business media property built specifically for the mobile web that has already reached 1.4 million unique visitors.

The relevance of new digital experiences to the viewable impressions  debate lies in how the content and associated ads are being presented to users. Both Facebook and Twitter have shown how this combination can work in the age of social streams and mobile devices — with Sponsored Stories and Promoted Tweets respectively.

Both ad units are integrated into the content feed from a look and feel perspective, and both target users based on their social graph relationships. The ad units themselves can be fixed in the flow of the content stream, moving down the page as the feed refreshes with new updates, or can be fixed at the top of the feed. In either case, since the content cascades down from the top of the app or web page the ad is always being presented, and thus seen, in the user’s viewing area.

The stream-formatted approach to content presentation is also starting to make its way on to traditional digital media websites like ESPN, which launched the beta of its SportsCenter Feed in September (below). ESPN, which has traditionally been an early adopter of digital technologies and experiences, is taking a similar approach to Quartz in delivering a real-time, ad-supported, news feed with the added capability to consume subsets of the stream via content-specific tabs —  as well as the ability to add skins to the background that further promote the content sponsor.

sportscenter-calic_usethis

In all of these stream examples, the ad creative is muted in contrast to the typical flashy ad unit and consists of a single advertiser. So what the advertiser loses in “wow” factor (or “ow” from the user perspective) with a traditional ad experience is made up for in relevance (hopefully) and singular attention by not having to compete with other advertisers on a page and by being presented front-and-center to the user — ensuring the ad is seen. As the real-time news feed approach to presenting media proliferates, it will alleviate the need to use verification services for viewable impressions.

Remember, it wasn’t that long ago that the ad tech industry was consumed with a different delivery issue — ad verification. The likes of AdSafe Media and DoubleVerify raised over $50 million combined in 2010-2011 to build a business around solving for this issue. In 2012 both companies replaced their CEOs while AdSafe also underwent a rebranding as ad verification became commoditized at the ad server level and a smaller problem, especially related to premium content publishers, than the industry led everyone to believe. Let’s not go through this again with viewable impressions.

Follow Alex Calic (@alexcalic) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Must Read

AdExchanger Senior Editors Anthony Vargas and Alyssa Boyle.

POSSIBLE 2026: AdExchanger's Hot Takes

AdExchanger Senior Editors Alyssa Boyle and Anthony Vargas share their takeaways from three days chatting about agentic AI at POSSIBLE.

Reddit Reports A 75% Boost In Q1 Ad Revenue As It Reaches For 100 Million Daily US Users

Generative AI search has pushed traffic off a cliff across most of the internet, but not on social platforms. Reddit included.

POSSIBLE 2026: Can AI Help Agencies Finally Break Down Those Silos?

Domenic Venuto, indie agency Horizon Media’s chief product and data officer, sat down with AdExchanger during POSSIBLE at the Fontainebleau in Miami to unpack the role of AI in today’s media and advertising landscape.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Touts Its AI Ad Tech Adoption And New AI Max Features

Google announced new features and ad types for AI Max, its AI-based bidding product for search and shopping or sponsored product ads. The company also touted “hundreds of thousands” of advertisers using AI Max.

Hand pressing blue AI button on keyboard. Digital collage of artificial intelligence interface.

Meta’s Ad Machine Is Purring, So Why Did Its Stock Drop?

Meta’s Q1 call sounded like an AI and hardware pitch, but under the hood it was still about one thing: investing in AI to squeeze more money out of its ads business.

Alphabet Exceeds $100 Billion In Q1 And Its Profits Almost Doubled

Alphabet earned $109.9 billion in Q1 this year, up from $90.2 billion a year ago. And that’s not even the truly gobsmacking number.