Home Data (Clean) Room For One More: Optable Joins Unified ID 2.0

(Clean) Room For One More: Optable Joins Unified ID 2.0

SHARE:
integration
Business creative solution concept - jigsaw on the blackboard

My kingdom for an independent third-party administrator.

Although The Trade Desk is still seeking an entity to fulfill the admin role for Unified ID 2.0, it continues to strike partnerships to support UID2 in the meantime.

On Thursday, Optable became the latest company to partner with The Trade Desk via UID2. The integration is in closed beta and set to go live for all Optable customers in Q4.

Unified ID 2.0 is an open-source industry initiative, spearheaded by The Trade Desk, that aims to replace third-party cookies with hashed and encrypted email-based IDs.

Like InfoSum, Amazon Web Services, Snowflake and Acxiom and Kinesso (both owned by IPG), Optable will be what’s known as a closed or private UID2 operator.

Closed operators run internal versions of the Unified ID 2.0 service so that they can process first-party data to encrypt and generate UID2 identifiers.

Optable will allow brands to automatically encrypt audience data and deploy UID2 IDs to The Trade Desk and other destinations that integrate UID2, which requires being able to convert personally identifiable information into advertising IDs on the fly, said Bosko Milekic, Optable’s chief product officer.

This type of setup makes sense for Optable, which bills itself alternately as a clean room and a data collaboration solution, and is similar to what other closed operators provide.

But what makes Optable’s UID2 integration a bit different from InfoSum and Snowflake, et al., is a set of controls designed to make it less complicated for publishers to deploy the IDs, Milekic said.

“What we found when we talked to publishers with PII who are interested in deploying UID2 is that the deployment itself is a point of technical friction,” he said. “It’s not necessarily easy to do, especially if you haven’t yet linked your registered users to your first-party audiences.”

Publishers have heightened sensitivity to data leakage (and no wonder). They need better controls for where and how their first-party data is used in order to feel comfortable doing things like injecting UID2 identifiers into their ad requests, Milekic said.

Optable will also provide publishers with a way to limit which users they enable UID2 for, so it doesn’t have to be the entire audience of registered visitors.

Although any company is welcome to join UID2 as a private operator if they’re willing to build the tools to support that type of integration, it’s no coincidence that multiple data clean room companies have been early adopters of the strategy.

In other clean room news, the IAB Tech Lab is planning to release a first draft of standards for data clean rooms by the end of the year, which should make it easier for UID2 to integrate with official clean room operators.

“A clean room provides an environment that allows for secure data exchange, providing advertisers an extra layer of data protection while still being able to reach valuable audiences across the open internet,” said Ben Sylvan, The Trade Desk’s GM of data partnerships.

The Trade Desk expects to see UID2 adoption grow as the DSP adds more clean room tech providers and other solutions, “including easy onboarding of first-party data from CDPs,” Sylvan said.

But achieving scale is still a challenge for identity initiatives. In fact, scale might just be UID2’s biggest challenge, Milekic said. (Other than the hunt for an admin.)

Despite interest from brands and publisher clients, “there hasn’t been a lot of scale yet on the supply side, particularly in certain regions,” Milekic said, pointing to Canada as an example. (Optable is headquartered in Montreal.)

And that’s the case despite launching beta tests for UID2 in Canada nearly a year ago.

But making it easier for publishers to deploy UID2 should help, Milekic said, and “we want to address those technical hurdles.”

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.