Home Data DAA’s Lou Mastria Blasts TPWG Decision

DAA’s Lou Mastria Blasts TPWG Decision

SHARE:

Lou-MastriaThe Digital Advertising Alliance’s managing director, Lou Mastria, reacted to the Tracking Protection Working Group’s decision to reject the DAA’s draft proposal for a universal Do Not Track standard, calling it “unfortunate” and “adding more pressure” to meet the group’s upcoming deadline.

“I think we proposed something that was workable and did a lot to address the concerns raised by various stakeholders,” Mastria said. “We think that would have positioned us a little further ahead, but according to [TPWG co-chair] Peter Swire, we’re going to move in a different direction.”

The DAA, along with the Interactive Advertising Bureau, the Network Advertising Initiative and others, submitted a proposal earlier this month to the TPWG that would allow advertisers to continue collecting and using behavioral data while stripping the data of personally identifiable information.

After reviewing the proposal, TPWG co-chairs Swire and Mathias Schunter announced last night they had decided to reject the DAA’s suggestion because it was “less protective of privacy and user choice than their earlier initiatives,” according to a group memo.

The organization will instead implement an earlier document, known as the June draft, that would be “more likely to lead to a standard that reaches the group’s objectives.”

Mozilla’s chief privacy officer, Alex Fowler, issued a statement supporting the TPWG’s decision: “Mozilla is pleased with the W3C co-chairs’ decision to use the June Draft as the basis for the Do Not Track standard, and for recognizing that the DAA’s alternate proposal would have been a step backwards in user choice and privacy. We will work with our W3C colleagues to standardize a Do Not Track solution that respects individual user intent while attending to valid commercial concerns.”

The concept of user choice continues to be a contentious point. Advertisers have argued that because Do Not Track signals can be turned on by browsers and servers, it is unclear how many people are actively opting out of receiving ads. “More signals are being turned on, but whether humans are doing it is anybody’s guess,” Mastria maintained. “The reason we came up with the proposal was so we wouldn’t have to worry about who set the signal. Anyone can turn [the DNT] signal on. It could be your browser, your company’s router, etc., and that’s not really user choice.”

Must Read

After The Election, News Corp Has Harsh Words For Advertisers Who Avoided News

News Corp’s chief exec blasted “the blatant biases of ad agencies and ad associations,” which are “boycotting certain media properties” due to “personal political prejudices.”

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.