Home Data Facebook Lets Competing Advertisers Target Off Each Other’s Site And App Data

Facebook Lets Competing Advertisers Target Off Each Other’s Site And App Data

SHARE:

fb-like-dataOne of Facebook’s hidden assets is the waterfall of data signals it gets from other websites and apps.

These signals wend their way to Facebook from social plugins, conversion pixels and retargeting cookies embedded on millions of websites and mobile apps. Facebook’s code snippets tell the social network whenever a user lands on a product page, reads an article or researches a travel package. It has been collecting such data for years, but has never activated it for ad-targeting purposes.

Until now.

Facebook will soon begin using data signals gathered from its publisher integrations to inform ad messaging, creating profiles based on a far more complete universe of potentially interested buyers than it has ever made available to advertisers before. In making the announcement, Facebook also said it will offer more robust user privacy controls, including opting out of this new stream of intent data.

This could get awkward fast, since Facebook will effectively be selling data from one advertiser to its competitors – perhaps generating targeted fashion ads from Target based in part on a person’s interest in swimwear gathered from a visit to HM.com.

“Advertisers may now potentially be suppliers of ‘signal’ for their competitors to buy ads against,” is how Rob Leathern, former CEO at Facebook PMD Optimal Inc., put it.

Facebook says it is sensitive to such concerns, and it intends to restrict its intent profiles to broad categories (“soccer enthusiast” rather than “soccer accessories shoppers”).

“We’re going to build this so that no single marketer’s data will disproportionately represent what we use to improve our ads targeting or ads delivery capabilities. In principle, this means larger marketers won’t disproportionately benefit their competitors,” it said in a statement to AdExchanger.

Additionally, website owners will be able to opt out of having data generated from their websites or mobile apps used for purposes of ads targeting. However, if they do so, they lose access to other marketers’ Web and app interest data.

In other words, if you want access to Facebook’s full arsenal of ad-targeting tools, you have to pay with your site and app data.

History suggests Facebook will keep the targeting broad, according to Marc Grabowski, entrepreneur-in-residence at Highland Capital Partners and a former senior executive at Nanigans and Yahoo.

“There is a decade of precedence with publishers anonymizing and aggregating data sets for category targeting purposes,” Grabowski said. “Publishers frequently use category-specific click data to inform behavioral targeting audiences, but less frequently leverage advertiser website landing-page data, as that can be considered crossing the line of data ownership.”

The extent to which site owners with valuable data will go with the flow, or ask to be removed from Facebook’s program, may depend on the nature of each advertiser and its strategic considerations.

Jewelry retailer Alex and Ani is one advertiser that will participate.

“The value of what we’re getting outweighs the risk of giving up data to a competitive set,” said Ryan Bonifacino, VP of digital strategy for the brand. Informing competitor campaigns is not a large concern, he said. “We assume that very forward-thinking sophisticated organizations can get our (shopper data) anyway. The Sephoras of the world have the ability to target Alex and Ani customers if they want to.”

Bonifacino does have a gripe for Facebook about the new program: “My major issue is a lack of education not only with our brand but with every other customer.”

Alex and Ani’s comfort with Facebook intent targeting can be partly attributed to the relatively short consideration cycle for the casual jewelry it sells. Marketers in the automotive, travel and financial categories are likely to fret more.

“This is great for brands who may not have a deep first-party data asset as they will be able to benefit from data gathered on vertically relevant sites and apps,” said Grabowski of Highland Capital Partners. “This will become especially interesting if category specific desktop website data can be leveraged to target audiences using mobile devices.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Joel Meyer, Chairman, Prebid.org

New Chairman Joel Meyer Dishes On Prebid’s Reset For The Agentic Ad Tech Era

OpenX CTO Joel Meyer, who was named Prebid’s new chairman, previews the org’s next phase and helping publishers navigate competing agentic protocols.

These are the days of our lives

After Years Of Fighting LGE, Alphonso Is Headed For An IPO – Unless Comcast Or The Koch Brothers Get There First

Alphonso – LG’s ad tech division – finally has a way out of its legal drama with parent company LG Electronics. Actually, it has three potential options.

Micro1 Wants Human Domain Experts To Profit From AI And LLMs

Much like the ecosystem of life that surrounds a blue whale, a market of AI SaaS vendors is springing up around the biggest AI companies. And AI data startup Micro1 is emblematic of the shifting nature of these early-stage AI vendors.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Programmatic Home Screen Ads Are Becoming More Standardized (And More Accessible)

How long does it take you to decide what to watch after you turn your TV on?

Nielsen’s Latest Updates Aim To Remove Bias From Its Measurement Strategy

Just in time for new TV programming to hit the screens in September, Nielsen is rolling out a few upgrades to its video measurement currency that will go live by the end of August

The Agency Black Box Is Breaking. Horizon Media’s Bob Lord Explains Why

According to Horizon Media’s Bob Lord, most agencies are trying to solve the wrong problem by obsessing over cost efficiency at a time when AI has quietly unlocked something far more valuable: the ability to become a growth partner to advertisers.