Home Data Nugget Are Marketers Actually Measuring Ad Viewability? AdExchanger And Moat Run The Numbers

Are Marketers Actually Measuring Ad Viewability? AdExchanger And Moat Run The Numbers

SHARE:

seenometrics-moatMedia buyers and suppliers are now authorized to transact on viewable impressions, but how many are even using this form of tracking?

To measure the adoption of viewability tracking and other forms of verification among national and global advertisers, AdExchanger recently worked with ad analytics firm Moat.

We supplied Moat with a list of 100 large online advertisers (a modified version of the Fortune 100, weighted to emphasize large digital marketers). Moat then used its crawler-based technology to determine how often those brands’ ad tags are served alongside tags from any of four ad verification vendors known for tracking viewable impressions: Integral Ad Science, DoubleVerify, comScore and Google-owned Adometry. (Moat also provides viewability metrics, but its solution was excluded from this analysis.)

Here’s what Moat found:

From 2013 to the first half of 2014, when the Media Ratings Council lifted its advisory warning against transacting on viewability, Moat observed a doubling of the number of advertisers running ad verification tags on at least half of their ad impressions, from 15% to 30%. Likewise, the number of advertisers running those ad tags on at least a quarter of their impressions also approximately doubled, from 32% in full-year 2013 to 60% in the first half of 2014.

So according to this experiment, a majority of major advertisers are verifying ads on at least some of their impressions. That’s not too shabby, from an adoption standpoint.

But it’s also not yet widespread. The four vendors profiled are prominent in the ad verification market. Given that fewer than one-third of advertisers on the AdExchanger list were observed to work with one of them on a majority of ad placements, full adoption of viewability measurement may be many months or years away.

Methodology: Moat.com crawls about 10,000 sites a day, and visits each of those sites a few hundred times a day, to build its index of digital advertising practices in the US and UK. The four providers of viewability metrics tracked for this analysis also provide other services such as fraud measurement, ad verification and brand safety tracking that are not within the scope of this research exercise. Therefore it’s possible that of the 60% of advertisers observed to be working with vendors such as DoubleVerify and comScore, not all are measuring viewability exclusively with those firms.

“Most of the tags do more than just viewability but I know from our interactions with marketers, viewability is the first thing everyone talks about,” said Moat CEO Jonah Goodhart. “Fraud detection has also become very popular recently,” a trend he said expects to continue.

Must Read

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.

Comic: America's Mext Top AI Model

AI Is Moving Fast. The Law, Not So Much

IAPP’s Global Summit in DC was a reminder that AI is moving fast – and judges, privacy lawyers and practitioner are racing to keep up.

CIMM Is Out To Prove That All Media Isn’t Equal

An upcoming paper from CIMM doesn’t just demonstrate that differences in media quality can be measured. It also argues that tying media value to short-term outcomes has perpetuated longstanding industry challenges.