Home Data Privacy Roundup Regulators Have Their Eye On The Dark Art Of Dark Patterns

Regulators Have Their Eye On The Dark Art Of Dark Patterns

SHARE:
Comic: Bark Patterns

privacy zuckering (noun)

: a dark pattern; the practice of tricking users into disclosing more personal information than they had intended to

Ah, the dubious honor of having an entire dark pattern named after you.

More than five years after GDPR went into effect, regulators in Europe finally exerted enough pressure on Meta that it will soon start asking its users for consent before processing their personal data for targeted advertising purposes.

A win.

Consent is becoming the de rigueur legal basis to process personal data for targeted advertising purposes in Europe, but getting it isn’t so easy. Collecting consent is a far more nuanced process than just getting someone to opt in. It also matters how you ask for it.

Shining a light

To take a step back, dark patterns involve the use of design deception to nudge (or trick) someone into taking an action they otherwise wouldn’t have taken if they fully understood what they were agreeing to.

Dark patterns go far beyond misleading data collection practices to encompass anything from hiding junk fees in a bill to using countdown timers on offers that aren’t actually limited to making it as difficult to cancel a subscription as it would be to solve the Riemann hypothesis. (I assume. I can barely calculate the tip on a restaurant check.)

In June, the Federal Trade Commission (which released a staff report last year about the rise in “sophisticated” dark patterns) filed a lawsuit against Amazon alleging the use of dark patterns to trick consumers into enrolling for Prime.

And later that month, Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay $18.5 million to refund consumers after settling with the FTC over detective sweepstakes practices, including leading people to believe that making a purchase would increase their chances of winning.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Cracking down on dark patterns in all forms is “a huge priority” for federal regulators, said Paavana Kumar, a partner at Davis+Gilbert.

The FTC will have no patience for the use of hidden clauses, vague statements or pre-ticked boxes. Tricking someone into giving their permission isn’t any better than not asking for permission at all.

“No matter whether you’re a marketer, publisher, technology company or retailer,” Kumar said, “if you haven’t been focused on dark patterns to date, now is the time to wake up.”

too many opt-in pop-upsLook in the mirror

Because it’s not just the feds that are taking notice.

Numerous state privacy laws, including in Connecticut, Colorado and California (under the CPRA), have prohibitions against the use of dark patterns to obtain consent. As under GDPR in Europe, consent must be unambiguous, informed, specific and freely given.

It’s a “significant trend that state privacy laws are specifically calling out dark patterns as an unlawful data privacy practice,” said Mary Engle, EVP of policy at BBB National Programs.

“As state laws go into effect, I expect we’ll see enforcement actions,” Engle said. “In California, for example, you have to provide symmetry in choice to accept or reject options, [and] I can see that as being low-hanging fruit for enforcement.”

Which is just as true back across the pond.

Dark patterns are on the radar of the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK, the European Data Protection Board and numerous other governmental bodies.

And although GDPR doesn’t explicitly mention “dark patterns,” it also requires that withdrawing consent should be as easy as it was to give it in the first place (which is known as the “mirroring effect”).

This isn’t a radical notion. And neither is respecting a person’s right to understand what the heck they’re agreeing to.

“It comes down to keeping the ordinary consumer in mind when designing your site,” Engle said, “and using simple design and clear, understandable language with the goal of enabling the consumer to easily make choices.”

But make sure to leave any loopholes at the door.

“Remember,” Kumar said, “‘mirror cancellation’ doesn’t mean a 17-step sign-up allows you to offer a 17-step cancellation mechanism!”

Enjoying this newsletter? Got any feedback to share? Bright ideas? (This cat does.) Anyway, let me know what you think. Drop me a line at [email protected].

Must Read

Viant Acquires Data Biz IRIS.TV To Expand Its Programmatic CTV Reach

IRIS.TV will remain an independent company, and Viant will push for CTV platforms to adopt its IRIS ID to provide contextual signals beyond what streamers typically share about their ad inventory.

Integral Ad Science Goes Big On Social Media As Retail Ad Spend Softens In Q3

Integral Ad Science shares dropped more than 10% on Wednesday, after the company reported lackluster revenue growth and softened its guidance for the Q4 season.

Comic: Gen AI Pumpkin Carving Contest

Meet Evertune, A Gen-AI Analytics Startup Founded By Trade Desk Vets

Meet Evertune AI, a startup that helps advertisers understand how their brands and products appear in generative AI search responses.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Private Equity Firm Buys Alliant As The Centerpiece To Its Platform Dreams

The deal is a “platform investment,” in which Inverness Graham sees Alliant as a foundation to build on, potentially through further acquisitions.

Even Sony Needed Guidance For Its First In-Game Ad Campaign

In-game advertising is uncharted territory even for brands like Sony Electronics that consumers associate with gaming.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

The Trade Desk Maintains Its High Growth Rate And Touts New Channels

“It’s hard not to be bullish about CTV when it’s both our largest channel and our fastest growing,” said The Trade Desk Founder and CEO Green during the company’s earnings report on Thursday.