Home Digital TV and Video TubeMogul Seeks To Erase Video Viewability Confusion

TubeMogul Seeks To Erase Video Viewability Confusion

SHARE:

Brett Wilson, TubeMogul 2013Video demand-side platform provider TubeMogul is adding a viewability-reporting feature within its dashboard today, promising to give marketers a record of where their video ads are seen and tools designed to improve ad avoidance.

“By integrating viewability reporting into our ad-buying software, we can provide metrics at the site level,” said TubeMogul CEO Brett Wilson.

In lieu of an industry standard around video viewability, TubeMogul sees this seamless reporting as an alternative to the usual method of giving a viewability “grade,” something that is ambiguous and open to manipulation.

Some of the aspects of reporting viewable impressions TubeMogul said it will make transparent include what portion of a video ad is in view and how long it remained viewable; whether a window is active or if the user may be looking at another open tab; the player size; whether sound was on or not; and how many ad impressions were not measurable.

TubeMogul’s position as a DSP gives its viewability-reporting feature some credibility, as agency and marketing clients increasingly demand greater proof that an ad was seen.

“A number of things give us legitimacy when it comes to viewability,” Wilson said. “For one thing, we’re not arbitraging media, so we have no incentive to tell one story to an advertiser and another to a publisher.”

The release coincides with the publication of a TubeMogul white paper on the subject of video viewability (download the PDF here). The company, which has spearheaded the OpenVideoView (OpenVV) consortium with ad-tech vendors including BrightRoll, Innovid, LiveRail, SpotXchange and others, discusses in the white paper overall rates of viewability for exchanges, direct buys and how much video is actually measurable for any kind of viewability.

The white paper, which studied the comScore top 100 sites, indicates the state of video viewability is poor, even when it comes to direct buys.

For instance, a typical piece of run-of-network, remnant buy is 22.8% viewable in the first 5 seconds of playback; on average, a so-called “premium” piece of inventory that is directly sold averages 48.9% viewability.

So what accounts for the lag? It’s the confusion driven by the notion of viewability, without a standard, being “in the eye of the beholder.” Second, it’s the confusion caused by the use of general display standards of viewability being applied to video, which given the sound and motion in addition to “sight,” complicates matters considerably.

For example, several major video ad servers surveyed for the white paper said they consider muted videos as viewable, while others said they hew to a stricter accounting of viewability and require that the sound be on during the ad.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“While many platforms and tools have now adopted the display standard when reporting video viewability to help drive consistent use of this measure, we want a standard to go beyond the coordinates of where an ad appears on the page for 1 second and take into account other factors that impact if the user is actually being exposed to the ad,” said Cheryl Stump, director of Audience On Demand at VivaKi, in an email. “We adamantly believe that all factors — in-view, length of the view, active tab, player size and sound execution — should be reported in order to provide the most comprehensive insight into how a campaign is performing and where improvements can be made.”

Is an industry standard for video viewability imminent?

“As an entrepreneur, I’m naturally impatient,” Wilson said, “but I feel the Media Ratings Council and Interactive Advertising Bureau are moving the process along.”

Must Read

Comic: No One To Play With

Google Pulls The Plug On Topics, PAAPI And Other Major Privacy Sandbox APIs (As The CMA Says ‘Cheerio’)

Google’s aborted cookie crackdown ends with a quiet CMA sign-off and a sweeping phaseout of Privacy Sandbox technologies, from the Topics API to PAAPI.

The Trade Desk’s Auction Evolutions Bring High Drama To The Prebid Summit

TTD shared new details about OpenAds features that let publishers see for themselves whether it’s running a fair auction. But tension between TTD and Prebid hung over the event.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

How Google Stands In The DOJ’s Ad Tech Antitrust Suit, According To Those Who Tracked The Trial

The remedies phase of the Google antitrust trial concluded last week. And after 11 days in the courtroom, there is a clearer sense of where Judge Leonie Brinkema is focused on, and how that might influence what remedies she put in place.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Ad Context Protocol Aims To Make Sense Of Agentic Ad Demand

The AI advertising agents will need their own trade group eventually. For now though, a bunch of companies are forming the Ad Context Protocol, or AdCP.

OUTFRONT Is Using Agencies’ AI Enthusiasm To Spur Wider Programmatic OOH Adoption

The desire for a data-driven reinvention of OOH inspired OUTFRONT to create agentic AI tools for executing and measuring OOH campaigns and comparing OOH to other channels.

Inside PubDesk, The Trade Desk’s New Dashboard That Shows What Buyers Actually Care About

A peek inside PubDesk, The Trade Desk’s new dashboard that gives sellers detailed info on how buyers value their inventory.