Home Marketer's Note The Second Party Data Opportunity

The Second Party Data Opportunity

SHARE:

joannaoconnelrevised“Marketer’s Note” is a weekly column informing marketers about the rapidly evolving, digital marketing technology ecosystem. It is written by Joanna O’Connell, Director of Research, AdExchanger Research.  

I had an interesting conversation about the “second party data” opportunity with some senior level publishers not too long ago, and it got me thinking about this subject anew.

I’ve always seen these kinds of relationships – where a marketer (or agency on a marketer’s behalf) has a direct relationship with a publisher where data is the thing being negotiated over (e.g. second party data… Get it? The marketer is the first party and the publisher is the second party) – as a huge opportunity to be explored. Back in the early agency trading desk days we had the idea that, within the walls of our agency, we could create symbiotic marketer to marketer data relationships (in this case the second party provider is another marketer, rather than a publisher). Think of a travel company with flights to tropical locales and a retailer selling resort-wear. But at the time, the tools that would enable such relationships just weren’t there.

Today, they are, at least if leading DMPs are to be believed. Just look at the recent panel I moderated, during AdExchanger’s inaugural Industry Preview conference, where second party data was heralded as the big opportunity to be explored in 2014. (Side note: AdExchanger got in on the fun just about one year ago today, with this comic strip on the subject: “Come on in to the data party, publishers!  It’s great in here!”)

Certainly, it feels like a cool development for premium publishers looking for new ways to create value and strengthen relationships with their key customers – it’s a new set of parameters on which to negotiate. It’s data that may be proprietary to that publisher and therefore highly valuable to certain buy-siders. And it creates a nice bypass for those, on both the buy and sell sides, feeling burned by – or simply suspicious of – the third party data ecosystem, increasingly under fire over questions of data quality and uniqueness, the sourcing of the data and more*.

I’ve always wondered about the structure of these deals, however, as well as the practical implementation of them.  I’m thinking about questions like this: How is the application of the data prioritized? If a cookie meeting a certain set of data parameters becomes available out in the programmatic ecosystem, who gets the right to show that cookie an ad?  Is it the marketer with whom the publisher has a data relationship? The audience extension buy the publisher is running? What about in the case of two marketers with a data relationship? How is the data prioritization set?  There may be some seemingly simple answers from a technical standpoint; I think the more complex answers are in the business decisions made which dictate how the tech is set up to behave.

All that said, these are by no means insurmountable questions.  In fact, the more publishers, marketers and their platform partners raise these questions on the ground every day, the sooner the second party data opportunity will approach market maturity – a good thing!

On that note, I’d love to hear from the community – marketers, agencies, publishers, tech providers – how are you tackling these questions? How are your second party data relationships going? Are they as fruitful as we all want them to be? What challenges are you running into, and how are you addressing them?

Joanna

*A conversation for another day: what IS the state of the third party data ecosystem? How are buyers (and sellers for that matter) assessing data providers, and what are they finding?  I plan on looking at this more closely!

Follow Joanna O’Connell (@joannaoconnell ) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Must Read

Single continuous line drawing robot riding pencil rocket flying in the sky. Tech education and creativity. Future technology development. Artificial intelligence. One line design vector illustration

Q3: Omnicom’s Media Business Is Growing, But Is It Agent-Proof?

If AI agents can plan and buy media, who needs a holding company? Good question. It came up during Omnicom’s Q3 earnings on Thursday.

Netflix Touts New Measurement Capabilities As It Struggles With “Modest” Engagement Growth

Netflix’s revenue grew 12% YOY to $12.9 billion in Q3, which it maintains is in line with its forecast. Its ads business, however, is lagging slightly compared with expectations, causing Netflix to tweak its forecast for the rest of the year.

Apple Publishes Its Plan To Wipe Out Web Tracking

Apple is coming for identity resolution. WebKit’s latest tracking crackdown targets the infrastructure behind post-cookie IDs – and switching to a first-party setup won’t necessarily spare vendors.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Slop Sites Are On The Rise. Is Ad Tech Ready For Its New MFA Challenge?

Advertising supply chain intelligence company DecryptAds uncovered more than 2,100 AI-generated recipe sites that are monetized with programmatic ads and feature fabricated author profiles.

How Australian Home Lender Lendi Measures The Invisible Work Of AI

Most brands and businesses are trying to figure out how to improve their metrics when it comes to AI – and also what those metrics even are.

AI Startup Minerva Built An Agentic CDP, But Don’t Call It That

Minerva wants to turn fragmented customer data into something marketers can use, with AI agents doing the work behind the scenes.