Home Marketers Can E.L.F. Cosmetics Become A Consumer Destination, Not Just A Brand?

Can E.L.F. Cosmetics Become A Consumer Destination, Not Just A Brand?

SHARE:

For a startup, 20 years can feel like a long time.

But for e.l.f. Cosmetics, the upstart beauty brand that made good, it doesn’t feel that way.

“We might be pretty big right now,” e.l.f. Chief Brand Officer Laurie Lam told AdExchanger. “But we are not a leader, necessarily, in the sense that we don’t have 100 years of history like a lot of our competitors do.”

History can be a burden for a brand, if it means that company is too set in its ways to pivot and try new things.

The brand itself started as a seller of $1 makeup only over the internet.

Which, seriously, c’mon.

Nowadays, the average unit price is $6, Lam said.

And e.l.f is a TikTok power brand that’s earned a spot in every cosmetics, pharmacy and department store.

The company. isn’t done dreaming big, either. If the brand has its way, you may hear the word e.l.f.-iverse again, and not just in this article.

AdExchanger caught up with Lam about her role – the company also has a CMO, Kory Marchisotto – and e.l.f.’s ambitions to be a consumer destination, not just a brand.

AdExchanger: How do you make money when your average unit price is $6 and the product is manufactured and shipped around the world, processed in a warehouse and delivered to someone’s doorstep?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

LAURIE LAM: It actually goes back to who we are as a company.

When we were founded in 2004, the founders started on the ecommerce model. They sold cosmetics over the internet for $1 – just to share with you how bat-shit bananas that is, not one company would ever do that now.

Our digital business is currently 19% of the overall sales.

But the most important thing is we never stopped bringing that community back. From when it was $1 premium cosmetics over the internet, that actually became the best focus group for e.l.f.

How do you keep those people coming back?

For one, we have 5 million members that are actively engaged on Beauty Squad [an influencer rewards and affiliate-style sales program]. They drive a disproportionate volume of sales to the site.

We also think about delivering rewards for loyalty. For example, we reward all purchases the same, whether it’s the DTC site, Amazon, Sephora, wherever. Customers can scan the receipt from anywhere. There are very few others that can say they do that, and it brings people back to the app and site.

In Piper Sandler’s list of Gen Z shopping destination sites, the list is big retailers and places you’d expect – Sephora, Ulta, YouTube, TikTok, etc. And then you see e.l.f. Cosmetics, out of nowhere.

Can you envision building that into a media business?

Part of our mission is to be at the apex of culture, entertainment and beauty. And entertainment can mean a lot of things to different people. For us, it means an actual e.l.f.-iverse [as in, Marvel Cinematic Universe, but e.l.f.].

We’ve actually been building around creators and influencers. But it also extends to gamers, other brands and collaborations, like Liquid Death. There are athletes and changemakers like Billie Jean King and Katherine Legge, who is the only woman to compete in this year’s IndyCar racing. So we are building an e.l.f.-iverse around us of like-minded disruptors.

That sometimes means going to a platform or a brand that someone else would say, “What are you doing here?”

Such as?

Roblox is probably the best example.

We were one of the first and have the highest-rated brand experiences on Roblox. We were unofficially one of the requested brands, because we have that community. So we’re there in an organic way. And the whole idea with Roblox is to teach other creators and entrepreneurs how to create universes and make money.

We have a book club on Roblox with Reese Witherspoon, and we built a racetrack when we partnered with Indy 500.

What was the Liquid Death reference?

We did a collaboration together. It was pretty killer, pun intended.

It was a five-piece makeup set we created with a coarse paint look, and it was set in a coffin. People and creators were creating this look all over TikTok. We sold out that kit in 45 minutes.

When you have a collab that sells like that, do you consider making it a regular product?

When we do these brand-on-brand deals, it’s really plugged into the cultural zeitgeist.

Liquid actually comes after many successful collaborations. Our first foray into a ‘brand-on-brand’ collab – again, I’m using air quotes – was actually with Chipotle.

And again, you might say, “Well, what does a brand like e.l.f. and Chipotle have to do together?”

We have three pillars in how we look at brand-on-brand collaboration. First, it has to be surprising to our community. It needs that shock factor.

Two, they need to be social. Meaning the campaigns are on social platforms, but they’re also social-led brands in many cases.

And the third piece of the formula is that we make them scarce. We’re not trying to have a corpse paint kit for the rest of the year. It’s a limited-time kit. And part of the appeal is you’ve got to be in the know to get it.

So, what happens after we sell out?

It sells out.

This interview has been edited and condensed

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.