Home Mobile Why Starting With Cookies Doesn’t Make Sense For Cross-Device Tracking

Why Starting With Cookies Doesn’t Make Sense For Cross-Device Tracking

SHARE:

Are some marketers approaching cross-device backward?

Tom Laband, CEO and co-founder of mobile data marketplace adsquare, thinks so.

“We see many advertisers start with cookie-derived data and bridge that to mobile IDs using cross-device vendors – and to me, that doesn’t make sense,” Laband said Thursday at a company event in New York City.

Device IDs, like IDFA on iOS and Android’s advertising ID, are persistent and often used as the connective tissue to link customer activity and identifiers across devices and channels.

“These are way more persistent than a cookie ID,” Laband said.

But scale is always an issue, and in order to get there, onboarders and cross-device providers are increasingly turning to probabilistic methods to pump up their reach.

“What’s happening now is that [marketers are] taking a desktop cookie and probabilistically connecting it to a mobile user,” said Kathleen Comer, GM of client services at The Trade Desk.

Even if they’re using a cross-device vendor like Tapad, Drawbridge or Oracle’s Crosswise to make the match between a cookie and device ID, the audience that’s being created is essentially a lookalike audience, rather than a one-to-one match to a device ID.

“I think we need more marketers to start using mobile data for mobile campaigns, as opposed to working with the big cookie-focused DMPs out there with fancy cross-device technology that allows the bridging of cookies to mobile devices,” Laband told AdExchanger.

It also makes sense to start with mobile IDs, he said, because the lifetime value of an app identifier is greater than a cookie – even a persistent cookie, which doesn’t expire when users close their browsers, but is at risk of being cleared at any time.

In other words, Laband argued, a more solid strategy would be to coalesce cookie data around a persistent anonymous identifier tied to a device, rather than creating cookie syncs between tracking data across different digital ad platforms – which can lead to data leakage – and then connecting those matched cookies to a mobile ID.

“When you start with a mobile device, there is no cookie syncing or there is less, and then you can use cross-device technology to bridge to cookies,” Laband said. “A profile can be more granular and be more accurate using a mobile ID, and mobile also has data sets that are not available in the cookie world, like location data and telco data.”

Must Read

VideoAmp Bets On AI To Connect Ad Planning And Measurement

VideoAmp is competing in the measurement space by sharpening its focus on TV audience data, ad performance and, of course, AI. The company is also making strategic hires and promoting from within.

Comic: Header Bidding Rapper (Wrapper!)

Sure, Debates Between Prebid Members Can Get Heated. That’s Why It’s The Programmatic Melting Pot

The Prebid Summit in New York City on Tuesday exceeded the event’s reputation for liveliness.

Has The Ad Industry Lost The Pulse Of American Consumers?

The ad industry has become a community of people who say things like “This is going to sound relatable” and follow it up with a sentence that may as well be Martian to 99% of America.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

LG And Magnite Launch Agentic Home Screen Ads With A Winning NFL Quarterback

LG home screen inventory is now available through agentic buying, opening up a premium TV placement to faster, more automated campaign setup.

Prebid’s Proposed Auction Overhaul Would Do What The Court Wouldn’t: Separate AdX From GAM

Reorienting the ad auction so that ad servers bid into Prebid lets publishers access demand from Google AdX without also having to use Google’s ad server.

Meet Starling, The Startup That Says It’s More Than Just Another CTV SSP

Starling recently launched as a connected TV SSP and wants to capitalize on the opportunity to address a major pain point facing CTV marketers: the lack of show-level data.