Home Native Advertising TripleLift Builds Server-Side Header Bidding For Native Ads

TripleLift Builds Server-Side Header Bidding For Native Ads

SHARE:

server-side-hb-nativeTripleLift is throwing its hat into the server-side header bidding ring.

On Tuesday, it rolled out its wrapper, Apex, which lets publishers bring in demand for their in-feed native ad placements.

TripleLift will run a first-price auction among all participating partners, a shift from the OpenRTB spec of a second-price auction that could result in higher payouts for publishers.

TripleLift co-founder Ari Lewine said this auction setup will allow a publisher’s native ad partners to better compete for in-feed placements. Since many publishers require in-feed ads to compete against their own branded content campaigns running in their ad servers, bidding at a higher CPM will increase the chance of the ad winning the slot.

While Apex could incorporate demand from Facebook, Twitter, Nativo, Sharethrough, content recommendation engines and outstream video, none of those partners have signed on yet – which could mean Apex never gets off the ground (as happened with OpenX Meta).

Lewine said publishers who want to use the product, like Intermarkets and The Guardian, are spearheading conversations     with their own native ad partners to encourage them to join.

And Lewine predicts the native ad ecosystem will work together better than the banner ad-focused SSPs.

“Our goal is to build a market, versus defend our market share,” he said. “Because the native ad ecosystem has less legacy holdup, I’m optimistic it will happen easier than in the banner ad space.”

Apex will work in parallel with a publisher’s server-side header bidding solutions for banner ads. Lewine noted publishers are building those two ad stacks separately.

While TripleLift integrates with all the major client-side header bidding wrappers,

Lewine said that setup makes it difficult for publishers to control what ad units end up in the feed and on the right rail.

He said Apex will give publishers more oversight around which ads show up in their feeds. Plus, it supports native ad templates, making it easier for publishers to control the look of their native ad placements.

Lewine predicts adoption could be swift, citing how fast publishers implemented client-side header bidding.

“Header bidding adoption in the past 12 months has been unprecedented,” Lewine said. “Publishers are regaining control of their ad businesses. They will earn more money, and users will win because the ads will look better with less latency.”

 

Must Read

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.

Comic: America's Mext Top AI Model

AI Is Moving Fast. The Law, Not So Much

IAPP’s Global Summit in DC was a reminder that AI is moving fast – and judges, privacy lawyers and practitioner are racing to keep up.