Home On TV & Video The Underlying Challenges Of One-To-One TV Targeting

The Underlying Challenges Of One-To-One TV Targeting

SHARE:

On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Michael Connolly, co-founder and CEO at Sonobi.

So, a group of guys is sitting down to watch the hockey playoffs on TV, and a Maybelline commercial pops up.

Even if the cosmetics advertisement is entertaining, does it have an impact on the guys who just watched it? The brand paid a considerable amount of money to reach millions of consumers, but it didn’t reach all the right ones.

The challenge with traditional TV is that it is insensitive. In contrast, streaming-services companies (such as Netflix, Hulu and Roku), smart TVs and online sports-streaming platforms (such as NFL Game Pass) have a much better understanding of the people who are watching their shows or games.

As such, they are the driving force behind recent attempts to rethink how we consume content on television. With advertising, this means moving away from presenting one ad to everyone and toward tailoring ads to the interests and demographics of the viewer and showing different, more relevant advertisements to distinct groups of people.

Despite such efforts to redesign how we capture audiences, traditional TV still mostly uses the tried-and-true one-to-many approach, and it continues to provide advertisers with massive reach and viewability. As media companies struggle to devise new metrics and numbers to define the true audience for media content, advertisers look for methods that lend themselves to targeting audiences in a one-to-one setting, rather than using the one-to-many technique.

Though the goal is for the viewer to experience an ad that feels customized for them, achieving one-to-one targeting in TV is challenging. How do you deliver that specific ad to the one person who needs to see it without being invasive? What information should be collected? And once the information is available, what is the best way to analyze it? At what cost? Are consumers ready for one-to-one targeting?

For individualized TV advertising to become a reality we need two key components: addressability and ad-serving technology. Addressability – to really know whom we are addressing requires a unique way to identify a viewer and an identification that is persistent. Currently, there isn’t massive scale on these two aspects, though smart TVs and streaming services are moving in this direction. If a person must log in to his or her account to watch TV, then they are targetable.

Besides addressability, technology also needs to mature to be able to manage the complexity of individualized TV advertising. In digital, we have the ad server. Interacting with it via an API is mature. In television, we don’t have a comparable standardized tech tool. Even if addressability was available at a large scale, the process of offering one-to-one advertising would still be a very manual effort in the last mile. This is not consistent with scalability and automation.

Once we have the ability to identify a person watching a particular piece of content on TV, and we have standardization for how to deliver an ad to them, we will see addressable TV become a viable option.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

At this point, it is really hard to provide a time frame for when one-to-one TV targeting will be available at a large scale. Developing the underlying technology requires a coordinated effort from many parties, such as big broadcasters, cable companies, networks and ad tech.

Follow Sonobi (@sonobi) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.