Home Online Advertising Corrected: At Aol’s Newfronts, Lines Between TV And Video Disappear

Corrected: At Aol’s Newfronts, Lines Between TV And Video Disappear

SHARE:

Ran HarnevoFor all the glitz and glamour that surrounded Aol’s Newfronts programming preview on Tuesday, perhaps the most relevant news for advertisers came at the end of the showcase with a mention of the unsexiest of topics: back-office operations designed to support the thousands of hours of digital video, along with analytics.

Following appearances by actors like Sarah Jessica Parker, Hank Azaria and Nicole Ritchie to promote their new Aol video series, the company discussed the new deal with media buying workflow software provider Mediaocean and digital video rights manager FreeWheel, as well as a new deal with Nielsen to provide “TV comparable” ratings for Aol’s online video.

FreeWheel is billing this new arrangement with Mediaocean, which is being inaugurated with Aol but will be rolled out across their respective new and old clients over the next few months as its “FourFronts solution.”

“There is no such thing as online video,” said FreeWheel co-founder and co-CEO Jonathan Heller in an interview with AdExchanger after the Aol presentation. “There is only TV. Marrying our distribution capabilities with Mediaocean and their presence in the buying community makes the point that in order for the video ad buying process to work, it has to be end-to-end. Or it doesn’t work at all.”

Cross-platform sales are a particular pain point for TV media buyers since very little overlap exists between reporting and ordering. The other complaint agencies often voice is a lack of premium inventory for web video and that it may bear a superficial resemblance to TV, but when it comes to executing a buy, it couldn’t be more different or complicated.

With Mediaocean’s buying software in place with agencies for both display and TV, plus with FreeWheel’s ability to transfer video from TV to digital, Nielsen will provide the measurement option. Or, as Aol’s SVP of video Ran Harnevo  awkwardly calls it, “visurement.” [Correction: This last line was misheard-DK]

“If we want TV to get closer to the web, we have to measure both the same way,” Harnevo told the midtown crowd at the Moynihan Station, the huge event space adjoining the city’s main post office.

John Burbank, Nielsen’s president of Strategic Initiatives, was then called to stage. He said, “We will measure Aol’s video content in an overnight fashion, just like we do for TV, so advertisers and agencies can understand who’s watching.”

Nielsen will measure every Aol video impression in a way intended to be comparable to TV. Still, this is just another step in Aol’s video ad sales strategy and not a game-changer, as comScore already provides a similar metric. But given Nielsen’s position as the standard for TV, Aol’s declaration that this could become the new standard for online video isn’t as far-fetched as it sounds.

Aol as the “new TV” was embedded in practically every presentation. And in some ways, given the similar TV-centric ambitions that Yahoo projected at its NewFront the night before, there is a recognition – if not a resignation – that online video values of “watching what you want, whenever you want” may be the rule for all content consumption now and in the future. However, when it comes to content quality, ad delivery and measurement, TV continues to be king.

That sentiment was brought home in a brief appearance by another new Aol partner, Mark Cuban, whose AXS TV cable network will be the terrestrial home for HuffPost Live, the portal’s 12-hour news webcast.

“Eighteen years ago, when we started AudioNet to stream live, I thought TV was going to be dead in a few years,” Cuban said. “But it’s not. What changed? Social media. We started telling each other what we were watching. Social media drives TV and TV drives social media. You can’t just be on mobile. You can’t just be on a tablet. You’re going to watch what you want on whatever’s the best screen. And TV is the best screen and it’s more alive than ever before.”

Must Read

Omnicom Investors Cheer IPG Sell-Off, Despite Weak Ad Spend In Q2

Omnicom is halfway through a major sell-off of IPG agencies. Its future looks healthier as it prunes lower-growth firms, including eliminating certain specialist firms and overlapping agencies in certain countries.

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”