Home Online Advertising Digitas, CBS Interactive Execs Talk Buy And Sell Side Issues

Digitas, CBS Interactive Execs Talk Buy And Sell Side Issues

SHARE:

cbsi-digitasGoogle yesterday brought together executives from Digitas and CBS Interactive to discuss how buyers and sellers are working together to evolve programmatic ad buying.

Joel Aranson, VP and director at Digitas, and David Chiang, VP of monetization with CBS Interactive, made clear during the “Think with Google” hangout on Google+ that automated media trading has come a long way in the last three to four years — and they expect big changes in 2013.

“I feel like a lot of publishers and advertisers have gotten a bad taste in their mouths from the initial use of programmatic premium,” Aranson said. “I think that the technology has improved and both sides have spoken to each other more and its gotten to a point where it is now mutually beneficial.”

Below are some key points from the Q&A, which was dubbed, “Programmatic in the Future.”

Programmatic Maturity

While the technology for offering programmatic buying has been available in some form for a few years, many, including CBS Interactive shut off that option due to channel conflicts.

Now, Chiang said, CBSi has happily opened this channel and become more strategic with it. It’s now working with Digitas and Vivaki Audience On Demand. “Now we can structure relationships with the direct sales side with real time bids and direct sales to meet everyone’s needs.

CBS is working with Digitas now to create a more holistic standpoint.

The Programmatic Future

“This is the new way, the new medium for online digital advertising moving forward. It provides the type of metrics, attribution needed for direct response and performance campaigns. It also meets the needs of the brand, both for advertiser and publisher.”

Chiang points out that CBSi is working in a world where it can monetize effectively, creating a happier and more “fruitful coexistence.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

From the buyer perspective, Digitas’ Aranson said he has seen publishers change their tune over the last few months.

“We from the buy side have always been wanting this and it’s hard to get things done when the sell side isn’t on the same page… It will start with display, then video and mobile. And we’ll figure out different ways to include new ad units as they come up.” 

Buyers: More Transparency Please

Digitas wants to see more transparent access to publisher inventory, especially from big networks like CBSi and other premium sites.

“Across these big sites, each client will want to buy and target in a different manner. It would be great to have a high level run of network type source but we also want to get more granular as we start from the top and work our way down,” said Aranson.

Eventually Aranson would like to get access all the way down to the smallest nuances and buy small as well as big. “Buyers don’t just want to buy run of site and call that premium. As a buyer we define it differently than a seller. People are calling some brands premium like CBSi, ESPN, but every expression on their site is not premium.”

That is a big discontent, Aranson said.

“There is premium inventory and then there are premium sites. For a buyer it is pre-sold, direct to publisher inventory that is guarantees and is highly desirable location. Anything that is guaranteed and anything that is unsold is not premium.” 

Chiang agreed with the point. “The site, the audience, guaranteed, not guaranteed, everyone has their own definition.”

Aranson continued, “I think that we are looking for the ability to go after specific parts of the site and even though it is unsold, we will pay a higher cost than the just the traditional run of site because we can tackle the granular data.”

He said once rates have been negotiated a buyer can activate the inventory at any given time – the biggest benefit from a demand standpoint.

Chiang said it comes down to revenue.We have been evaluating more programmatic options but at the end of the day this is a yield question. If we understand the entire opportunity there is going to be a placement, guaranteed or not, we will look at this holistically.”

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Spicy Quotes You’ll Be Quoting From The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

A lot has already been said and cited during the Google ad tech antitrust trial, with more to come. Here are a few of the most notable quotables from the first two weeks.

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.