Home Online Advertising Facebook And GroupM Tussle On Third-Party Viewability Verification

Facebook And GroupM Tussle On Third-Party Viewability Verification

SHARE:

The fox can’t guard the chicken run.

GroupM is not down with Facebook and Google’s reticence around third-party verification tags.

“You can’t measure yourself,” said John Montgomery, COO of GroupM Interaction, North America, speaking at AdExchanger’s Clean Ads I/O conference in New York City on Wednesday.

The fact that Facebook is working closely with the Media Rating Council to accredit its tech has little to do with GroupM’s stance, said Montgomery, who took the stage alongside Daniel Slotwiner, Facebook’s director of advertising research, and Howard Shimmel, chief research officer at Turner Broadcasting System.

“Whenever we have these third-party discussions with [Facebook and Google] they say, ‘Our technology is so good we can probably measure what’s appeared and what’s viewable better than you can’ – but that’s not the point,” Montgomery said. “It’s not good governance to measure yourself.”

Slotwiner, as to be expected, saw the situation differently. Asked whether Facebook can get away with things that other publishers can’t because of its reach, size and influence, Slotwiner strenuously demurred.

“I don’t feel like we’re getting a pass,” Slotwiner said. “I’m not saying, ‘Trust us,’ I’m saying we need to be transparent about how much is in view and what we’re delivering. There needs to be transparent measurement systems in place so that [our] value is not a black box.”

In other words, third-party tags aren’t welcome on Facebook, but other forms of independent third-party verification are. Yahoo, by contrast, announced Wednesday that it would partner with verification vendors, including DoubleVerify, Integral Ad Science, comScore, Moat and others to bring third-party tagging onto its O&O and network sites.

Also muddying the waters is the fact that Facebook and GroupM have different definitions of viewability. Whereas Facebook says an ad is viewable the moment even a portion of it enters a user’s screen, GroupM’s line couldn’t be harder – 100% in view for display and 100% in view for video with audio on and autoplay off. [Yet both are departures from the MRC’s standard of 50% of pixels in view for one second for display and two seconds for video.]

But it’s Facebook’s market dominance that allows it to sustain its particular viewability standard, Montgomery said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“There are a couple of must-buy media who are able to push back and say, ‘We’re not going to take your tags, we’re not going to look at independent measurement and we’re not going to take your viewability standards … and I think you really are getting a pass on it,” Montgomery said, addressing Slotwiner, noting that when a platform has nearly 1.5 billion users, almost anything it does will have an impact.

Montgomery said he recently took a straw poll of the trading leads at GroupM and each one said that Facebook’s stance on viewability was a major factor holding them back from spending more on the platform – although, “$4.3 billion a quarter isn’t a bad number,” Montgomery quipped.

But the needs of media buyers alone don’t sway Facebook, Slotwiner said.

“As far as we’re concerned, that’s not how you make a decision about what to do,” he said. “Of course we want more investment on our platform, but we don’t want it at the long-term cost of value and customer experience. We might not have [more than 1] billion users if we made a bunch of decisions on that basis.”

GroupMpanelThe debate crystallized around the notion of autoplay video. Facebook loves it, GroupM doesn’t.

According to recent research commissioned by Nielsen on behalf of Facebook, “the moment a video ad was viewed (even before one second), lift happened across ad recall, brand awareness and purchase consideration.” But that’s nowhere near enough to satisfy GroupM and its clients.

“It’s not that we’re rooted in the past,” Montgomery said. “We fully understand that short-form mobile video is coming [and] our creative directors are having to create around that – having a celebrity in the video within the first two seconds because that works better, for example. But it doesn’t mean Facebook is doing a good thing. It means that it’s a high-reach medium and we’re adapting.”

Update: video added June 4. 

Must Read

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.

TikTok Video For Open Web Publishers? Outbrain Built It.

Outbrain is trying to shed its chumbox rep by bringing social media-style vertical video to mobile publishers on the open web.

Billups Launches Attention Measurement For Out-Of-Home

Billups, a managed services agency that specializes in OOH, is making its attention measurement solution and a related analytics dashboard available for general use.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria

The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Case Is Over – And Here’s What’s Happening Next

Just three weeks after it began, the Google ad tech antitrust trial in Virginia is over. The court will now take a nearly two-month break before reconvening for closing arguments right before Thanksgiving.

Jounce Media's Chris Kane at Programmatic IO NY on Sept. 25, 2024.

The Bidstream Is A Duplicative, Chaotic Mess – But It Doesn’t Have To Be That Way

Publishers are initiating more and more auctions – but doesn’t mean DSPs are listening to more bids, according to Chris Kane.

Readers Are Flocking To Political News, Says WaPo – And Advertisers Are Missing Out

During certain periods this year, advertisers blocked more than 40% of The Washington Post’s inventory over brand safety concerns.