Home Online Advertising Rubicon SEC Filing: Chango’s 2014 Revenues Were $43M, But Retargeting Firm Wasn’t Profitable

Rubicon SEC Filing: Chango’s 2014 Revenues Were $43M, But Retargeting Firm Wasn’t Profitable

SHARE:

rubicon-changoChango recorded 2014 revenues of $43 million prior to its acquisition by Rubicon Project, according to a new US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing.

But the company was not profitable, despite being an early player in the lucrative retargeting niche. It reported a loss of just under $1 million for the year. Read the 8-K.

Chango offers website and search retargeting capabilities to a customer list that includes 60 marketers in the Fortune 500. In Q2 it sold to Rubicon for $122 million in cash and stock, representing a roughly 3x multiple on the 2014 revenue figure reported Friday.

The lack of profitability for 7-year-old Chango shows just how tough it can be to make a late-stage ad tech startup succeed at a time when venture capital is hard to come by for firms focused on display ad tech. (Startups focused on TV/video, commerce and mobile appear to be having an easier time, as evidenced by new rounds for firms like ISpot.tv, Purch and Altitude Digital.)

Rubicon’s filing gets to the heart of the challenge for late-stage DSPs and ad networks. Chango’s cost of revenue, including data and media costs, totaled $25 million in 2014, or more than half of total revenue. Meanwhile sales and marketing costs were $13 million, and technology and development costs were $3 million.

If that were all of the company’s expenses, Chango might have squeezed out a slight $1 million profit, but the smallest line item of them all – $3 million worth of general and administrative costs – put the company into the red for the year.

Its acquisition brought Rubicon more firmly into the buy-side arena with offerings geared to the agency and marketer buyer. While Rubicon already had a fully featured demand-side platform, Chango brought considerable customer scale along with about 150 employees to serve those clients.

The deal followed Rubicon’s acquisition of iSocket and ShinyAds, two platforms for deal automation that cost less than $30 million cumulatively. The tiny deal price suggested that the programmatic “orders” business was more nascent than some had thought, but Rubicon is making some progress.

In Q1 2015, CEO Frank Addante said this part of Rubicon’s business was 15% of overall managed revenue, up from 13% in the fourth quarter.

Corrected: An earlier version incorrectly presumed Chango’s numbers were in US currency. Story has been updated. 

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.