Home Platforms Rubicon Project Feels ‘Slight Ding’ As Buyers Cut Off Resellers

Rubicon Project Feels ‘Slight Ding’ As Buyers Cut Off Resellers

SHARE:

Rubicon Project missed revenue projections for the quarter as programmatic changes, including the new transparency standards App.ads.txt and sellers.json, affected its topline revenue growth.

Rubicon Project’s Q3 revenue grew 27% year over year to $37.6 million. Year to date, its revenues are $107.9 million, which represents 30% growth compared to the same period last year.

“We got dinged by [App.ads.txt and sellers.json] slightly,” CEO Michael Barrett told investors on the company’s earnings call Wednesday. “I can’t imagine what happened to exchanges that aren’t as clean and well-lit and polished as ours.”

The transparency standards let buyers do supply-path optimization, or cut out resellers of publisher inventory. When buyers cut out those resellers, it hurt Rubicon Project’s revenues, since it works with both publishers and resellers of a publisher’s inventory.

“Buyers approached it with a ‘one-size-fits-all’” mindset, CEO Michael Barrett said. They paused all campaigns that weren’t deemed “direct” via the new standards and then reviewed on a case-by-case basis ones they might reconsider.

Barrett feels those buyers may add back some resellers and take a more nuanced approach in the future.

Google switching to a first-price auction and removing last look also created some initial volatility – though Barrett said the net results have been “neutral to slightly positive.”

Rubicon Project is also undertaking its own version of supply-path optimization to root out unprofitable impressions, which reduced costs even more than anticipated.

Analyzing every impression in the bidstream is expensive and inefficient, especially after header bidding created multiple paths to the same impression. Two years ago, Rubicon Project acquired nToggle to help with “traffic shaping,” or selecting fewer impressions to look at to monetize.

This quarter, Rubicon Project removed inventory from its exchange that monetized at very low CPMs, fill rates or not at all. The network optimization removed some revenue from its exchange, but made it much more profitable.

That optimization was enabled by moving its nToggle-based technology from a hardware-based to software-based deployment. The exchange then removed servers and reduced its data costs.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But nToggle has done even more to help Rubicon Project reduce costs over the past two years.

Rubicon Project spent $40 million on capex, including costs to process impressions, the year it acquired nToggle. It halved that yearly spend to $20 million in the past two years – even as ad requests doubled year over year. At a deal price of just $38.5 million, “the nToggle acquisition has greatly exceeded expectations,” Barrett said.

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

Judge Mehta’s Remedies For Google’s Search Monopoly Won’t Cure What Ails Publishers

Remedies in the federal search antitrust case against Google landed with a thud earlier this week. Most publishers and ad industry pundits were sorely disappointed.

Conversion APIs Are Becoming Table Stakes – But Not All Brands Have Bought In

CAPI integrations have moved from a nice-to-have to a necessity for anyone operating within walled garden environments. Now they’re laying the groundwork for an outcomes-driven ad ecosystem.

Peppa Pig

The Media And Retail Deals Behind The Peppa Pig Franchise Expansion

Peppa Pig is everywhere. Whether or not you have children, you likely know the little girl pig from the kid’s cartoon show. But the Peppa media franchise is just getting started.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How A For-Profit College Is Using CTV Ads To Win Over New Students

The American College of Education partnered with performance TV company MNTN to better reach its audience of adults seeking higher education.

Critics Say The Trade Desk Is Forcing Kokai Adoption, But Apparently It’s Up To Agencies

Is TTD forcing agencies to adopt the new Kokai interface despite claims they can still use the interface of their choice? Here’s what we were able to find out.

Why Big Brand Price Increases Will Flatten Ad Budgets

Product prices and marketing budgets are flip sides of the same coin. But the phase-in effects of tariffs, combined with vicissitudes of global weather and commodity production, challenge that truism.