Home Podcast Podcast: Is Programmatic Good For Publishers?

Podcast: Is Programmatic Good For Publishers?

SHARE:

The first slur against programmatic, dating to about 2008, was that RTB stood for “race to the bottom.” In the same year Jeff Zucker, then CEO of NBCU, decried the trade of “analog dollars for digital dimes.” Since then programmatic’s reputation – and its associated revenue value to media companies – has improved dramatically.

But there is new grousing afoot.

Brian O’Kelley, who built the first exchange, recently said on this podcast, “It’s unclear if it actually is better from a yield perspective than the old way.” And a new academic study appears to throw cold water on programmatic’s value. A group of researchers tried to put a value on the revenue lift associated with “targeted advertising” by observing revenue from pages that contained tracking code. They concluded that value may be as low as 4%. [Read the paper and a sharp critique of it penned by CafeMedia EVP Paul Bannister.]

Today on the podcast we dive into this question with Jana Meron, SVP of programmatic and data strategy at Insider Inc. Meron is a pioneer of programmatic on the sell side, and she sees immense value in programmatic so long as publishers take an experimental mindset and don’t get hung up on RTB.

“Programmatic is good for publishers depending on how they use it,” she says. “Programmatic is about pipes talking to each other. Yes, it’s about bidding, but it doesn’t have to be.”

Meron describes the uptick in demand for “all things P” – meaning “premium” deal types in the form of programmatic guaranteed, preferred deals and private auctions. Ongoing concerns about trust and transparency have boosted adoption of these buying structures.

She also emphasizes the data and insights associated with selling programmatically.

“We’re getting to a place in the industry where we’re more sophisticated, and we’re able to have insights from programmatic that we’ve never had before,” Meron says. “And so, the concept of programmatic being ‘bad for publishers’ or publishers distancing themselves from it is forgetting about the value. If someone does a very large content campaign, shouldn’t they be supplementing that with a programmatic buy so you’re looking at your media mix holistically?”

Must Read

How Advertisers Can – And Cannot – Get In Front Of Chatbot Shoppers

Brands have plenty of ways to boost search visibility—paid, organic, and earned. But if a CEO demands presence in customer journey recommendation engines and is ready to pay, what can a marketer do?

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.